cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 年前How it started vs. How it's goinglemmings.worldimagemessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1imageHow it started vs. How it's goinglemmings.worldcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 年前message-square69linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarewhyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up64·1 年前Or when you say there’s something wrong and the new version is just the same with comments
minus-squareOhVenus_Baby@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Because if I choose squirrel everytime I’ll never get anything done.
minus-squarewhyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前Yeah but you would have a lot of nuts!
minus-squareMajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Yes. I love the confidently incorrect additional comments explaining in detail how the incorrect code works. Though I’m usually pretty angry at that point, it is also pretty funny.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 年前ChatGPT would not let me call it “you doofus” when I point outed it had done that repeatedly. For “policy violations”. Edit: I don’t know how I screw uped that wording, but I’m leaving it.
Or when you say there’s something wrong and the new version is just the same with comments
Because if I choose squirrel everytime I’ll never get anything done.
Yeah but you would have a lot of nuts!
Yes. I love the confidently incorrect additional comments explaining in detail how the incorrect code works.
Though I’m usually pretty angry at that point, it is also pretty funny.
ChatGPT would not let me call it “you doofus” when I point outed it had done that repeatedly. For “policy violations”.
Edit: I don’t know how I screw uped that wording, but I’m leaving it.