Wilshire@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoJudge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trumpwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1637arrow-down16
arrow-up1631arrow-down1external-linkJudge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trumpwww.theguardian.comWilshire@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square59linkfedilink
minus-squarestoly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 years agoSCOTUS can take any case they want. But they don’t have all that much time so have to pick and choose until juicy ones.
minus-squarepdxfed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·2 years agoThe amount of faith you have in SCOTUS is concerning, they’ve already clearly demonstrated they’re not basing opinions on law but who appointed them.
minus-squarestoly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 years agoI have no faith in them. Ignoring them doesn’t fix things and pointing out how the world works does not imply faith.
SCOTUS can take any case they want. But they don’t have all that much time so have to pick and choose until juicy ones.
The amount of faith you have in SCOTUS is concerning, they’ve already clearly demonstrated they’re not basing opinions on law but who appointed them.
I have no faith in them. Ignoring them doesn’t fix things and pointing out how the world works does not imply faith.