misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前Framework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square288fedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down110
arrow-up1637arrow-down1external-linkFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square288fedilink
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 个月前Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
minus-squareenumerator4829@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前I thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?
Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
I thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?