Sure.
My suggestion is to strategically select appropriate demands, rather than just latching on to edgy sounding phrases like “make every employee a board member”.
Perhaps, although it looks like a significant portion of users think its a serious suggestion, and are conflating board membership with representation.
The links are all about employee share holdings and elected representatives. There are no links regarding employee board membership, probably because it’s an absurdity. One of us really does need to do some reading.
Somehow I’m getting the sense that your very narrow view of the “realm of possibility” doesn’t match, you know, the reality of things.
Sure ok. When every employee begins a board member I’ll know I was wrong.
Aren’t there some Australians for you to discourage?
In sorry you find my views discouraging.
If your demands can’t withstand some healthy criticism on lemmy then you’re destined for failure.
Criticism is fine when paired with suggestions. Do you have any of the latter?
Sure. My suggestion is to strategically select appropriate demands, rather than just latching on to edgy sounding phrases like “make every employee a board member”.
I think you’re taking that all caps comment a bit too seriously.
Perhaps, although it looks like a significant portion of users think its a serious suggestion, and are conflating board membership with representation.
Someone already linked you to the concept. Maybe try this thing called “reading” sometime before this thing you do called “babbling”.
The links are all about employee share holdings and elected representatives. There are no links regarding employee board membership, probably because it’s an absurdity. One of us really does need to do some reading.
<ModeratorHat>
The horse is dead. Leave it.
</ModeratorHat>
Removed by mod
Removed by mod