Would this be the Brave that has the cryptobro stuff in it?

Unfortunately Kagi is out of reach of most of the world. I’m sure it’s great for those privileged enough to have access to it, though.

How 'bout you go check the dictionary? You know, the dictionary that was explicitly cited above.

it is useful for juniors

[citation needed]

I would argue that for juniors in particular AI is dangerous because they lack the mental tools necessary to spot the hallucinations and thus bad information and bad work will be amplified, not ameliorated.

But of course people who are actually competent at their jobs don’t need the “help” that AI offers.

It’s one of those conundrums: dangerous for half, useless for the other half. LET’S PUMP IN BILLIONS!

Oh, God. Freeze Peach has reached the UK.

Roko’s Basilisk is all part of the “Less Wrong” cult that permeates Silly Con Valley.

Whatever you do, do not look up terms like “TESCREAL” or “Less Wrong” or “Roko’s Basilisk” or “Effective Altruism” or “Longtermism” or …

Well, basically, don’t look up anything related to Silly Con Valley techbrodude CEOs. It is literally insane.

And here you come SO FUCKING CLOSE … and still fumble the ball. Tsk. Tsk.

Removed by mod

(Hint: Check your assumptions. And while you’re at it check the thread history.)

I’m pretty sure that any murder is a death sentence.

(Hint: check your assumptions.)

Yes it is, actually.

Methings someone doesn’t understand what “evidence” and “sources” are.

No it is absolutely not theft. It is not theft by law. (There’s a reason why we have both “theft” and “infringement” in the lawbooks: they’re different things!) It is not theft morally. (Theft removes the owner’s ability to use something. Infringement does not. Infringement is a lesser moral crime if it is a crime at all.)

Please do not fall into the trap the IP holders like to lay by equating theft and infringement in your mind. You can have your opinions on whether infringement is bad or not (and the facts are … complicated with both sides being largely full of shit on this), but it is a matter of fact that theft and infringement are entirely different things.

Use the right term for the offence. Don’t let IP holders’ deliberate conflation to confuse the issue get to you.

Oh no! Talentless louts don’t like people who’ve cultivated actual skills that people appreciate!

…

Wait, remind me: Whom does this inconvenience?

I’m pretty sure it is too. For starters the part that’s been layered on top doesn’t have that suspicious 50/50 light/dark thing going on that gives away so many AI generations.

Toward the end they mention also the bit about the writing also being bullshit generators, no?

To paraphrase someone far more clever than me: “If you can’t be bothered to actually write it, I can’t be bothered to read it.”

Woohoo! Finally a company I can boycott that’s not already in my boycott of all American companies!

Allow me to fix that for you:

computer scientists: We have invented virtual dumbasses who are constantly wrong: Tech CEOs.