• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think this could be good.

    on principle i will never trust any corporation to do good things unless compelled to by a higher power such as the state, and i certainly do not trust them to do good things when the corporate-speak being used to describe those things is “enhanced features like dynamic pricing and daypart offerings along with AI-enabled menu changes and suggestive selling.” reeks of grift

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure, but nothing I wrote above depends on trust. This seems like it could be an Econ 101 example of the profit motive increasing the total utility in the system. Hence why I said this has the potential to be win-win-win.

      I don’t trust companies to pursue anything other than the profit motive but sometimes that can be a good thing.

      • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Sure, but nothing I wrote above depends on trust.

        the premise of a “win-win-win” scenario is necessarily predicated on the belief that a corporation would ever let such an arrangement occur versus just shamelessly exploiting its customers and telling them to love it or leave it, which is a form of trust. in my mind that is trust that is severely unearned by literally any current corporation—and i would firmly assert that even outside of a vacuum the vast majority of corporations will gladly tell (and right now are in the process of telling) their customers the latter