schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 个月前Critics decry Vietnam’s ‘draconian’ new internet lawwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down16cross-posted to: world@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1189arrow-down1external-linkCritics decry Vietnam’s ‘draconian’ new internet lawwww.theguardian.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 个月前message-square45linkfedilinkcross-posted to: world@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareAmoxtli@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down60·edit-27 个月前If only the US and EU had this to suppress the “Far Right”. Democracy would be protected.
minus-squarePanArab@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·7 个月前The US is very far right though. In the US something like this will be used to punish women seeking abortions.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 个月前All this would do is turn the far right into a slightly more hidden far right.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 个月前No, it would make it more explicitly far right. It turns out being able to identify users on also platforms is useful to silence dissent.
If only the US and EU had this to suppress the “Far Right”. Democracy would be protected.
That’s not how it works.
The US is very far right though. In the US something like this will be used to punish women seeking abortions.
All this would do is turn the far right into a slightly more hidden far right.
No, it would make it more explicitly far right. It turns out being able to identify users on also platforms is useful to silence dissent.