• stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    Again you’re not reading. I’m sorry but I don’t have any more time to waste on you. You can scroll down with your mouse wheel to find a more people in that thread who use the term, or you can search Google. If you choose not to do those things then you are refusing to acknowledge evidence which directly contradicts your point, which is a toxic and self-destructive form of willful ignorance that I can’t abide unless it’s I paid position and I guarantee you can’t afford me.

    My time is valuable so I’ll be blocking you without reading your next comment to make sure you’ve read this one.

      • stinky@redlemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I wasn’t talking to you and you don’t have the right to be angry about what I said to someone else. How entitled of you. If I opened mail I found in your mailbox would I have the right to get angry about what I read in it? Stupid waste of a human.

        Further, what’s the point of saying you’re being sarcastic? It doesn’t add any value, much like the comment itself. It pollutes the discussion, as do you.

        I’ll block you without reading your next response to make sure you’ve understood this comment.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          And the award for zero self-awareness goes to this person above. They get upset when their (incorrect) argument against my earlier post is mirrored back to them. Happy to be blocked by someone so fragile.