Some progress, finally.

Edit: for the benefit of the tinfoil hat wearers, assisted dying is not the same as euthanasia.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    What evidence do you have that the law will become so lax that doctors will aggressively push people to being euthanised?

    Canada

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Because “they just will mate. Slippery slope innit.” isn’t one IMO.

      ^^

      You’re just back at the “it’s a slippery slope” argument.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Canada literally isn’t the UK.

          The motion that was passed is nothing like the framework Canada has.

          Plenty of countries ban drinking alcohol. You may as well be saying that having restrictions on alcohol for under 18s means it’s a slippery slope and it’ll be banned here. After all, Saudi Arabia literally did it. America literally did it. Qatar literally did it. Etc.

          Like I said, I want evidence. Not slippery slope fallacy. Show me MPs saying they intend to implement the system Canada has.