Even if Mozilla goes closed source the already existing forks can continue
Theoretically yes, practically no. Maintaining a secure modern web engine that's up to date with - and a part of - setting web standards is something that costs tens of millions per year. Sometimes this even spills into the hundreds of millions.
Random fork projects don't have the resources to do that.
I get a lot of hate for it but some AI inclusions are genuinely good.
Firefox's (local, FOSS) AI translation is infinitely better than scraping all the info and sending it to Google Translate servers, and nobody will convince me otherwise.
The screen reader improvements that use AI are good as well. Has anybody here used screen readers for web pages? They are awful. It's good that someone is willing to improve them. My sister is blind so this matters a lot to me.
The (locally generated) AI assisted link previews aren't for me as I imagine they're unnecessarily taxing on older PCs, but they're not exactly an evil inclusion. I can see it being a useful feature.
I'm not a fan of the LLM sidebar, but it's opt-in and you can at least choose open models or even host your own. Plus there's the unfortunate truth that many people that Firefox is trying to win over ("normies") now expect features like that.
The hate is so overblown. Everyone is so negative and absolutist about everything all of the time. It's exhausting.
Kid Starver doesn't really make sense, he's expanded free school meals, greatly raised minimum wages, increased free childcare, brought about the biggest increase in workers rights in a generation (parents tend to work), removed the two child benefit cap, etc.
Queer Harmer probably has more legitimacy to it, I suppose? The high court (not appointed by government or Starmer, btw) had a controversial ruling on gendered toilets, saying that premises are free to exclude trans women from women's toilets if they so choose. So far the government has made no attempt to alter the law to amend that, so it can perhaps be taken as silent support of that ruling.
Laptop OEMs seem to go with fingerprint readers that have no Linux support.
A number of distros out of the box have some IMO dumb things you need to change.
E.g. Fedora insisting on having their own Flatpak repository that isn't as well-stocked or updated as Flathub, and missing audio/video codecs (I realise this is due to licensing concerns, but other distros get around it).
I'd like Linux to feel more like an ecosystem. If I could sync my DE's settings, installed apps, etc as trivially as I can sync my Firefox bookmarks/settings/extensions then I'd be happy. Frankly I'm amazed that Gnome and KDE haven't attempted this.
Yes, I know I can manually and painstakingly do a lot of this with Syncthing. It's not the same. It's a lot more time/effort and you need the knowledge to set it up.
That's a shame. I've had very good experiences with Sony upper mid range/lower high end TVs. Their image processing is second to none IMO, they seem to use more powerful CPUs than a lot of other android TV makers, and their use of AndroidTV means I can trivially customise my TV in a way that I can't with lots of other brands (strip out ads, basically).
Shit, my oldest daughter moved into a flat with friends when she started uni not long ago, and took my old 2007 42" 1080p Bravia that I bought all those years ago. She hadn't even been born yet, and it still looks shockingly good.
I'd be wary of smart glasses though, they're the holy grail of data harvesting. Companies will be able to see exactly what holds people's attention, what they look at most, what tempts them most, as well as see any personal information you look at, what physical goods you own and interact with, etc.
There's a reason Google chased it so hard, and why companies like Meta are trying to do it now.
Gnome 46? And they won't update it for at least another year?
Jeez, we're almost at Gnome 50...