• Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It just seems strange to portray highway interchanges in a positive light. Like, they might be the safest interchange for stroads intersecting an interstate, but that’s kinda like putting a $25M bandaid on a bullet wound.

      • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I want you–a random individual–to go on stage, and tell the country that just elected Donald Trump to make cities walkable.

        Have a ball.

        DDIs are the best we have right now. At the very least, the conservative nutjobs in my city don’t detest them to hell… much. They can be scaled down, and single lane versions would be perfectly acceptable in a walkable city.

        • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Transportation planning is a local issue, not a national issue. Obviously national funding plays a role, but you don’t need national funding for sidewalks and bike infrastructure. Vallejo’s local and state government representatives are all Democrats.

    • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      they solve far more problems than they introduce.

      It is worse for pedestrians, who now have twice as many traffic signals to wait for. It is worse for cyclists, with “gauntlet” bike lanes running between through- and right-turning lane. It is only better for cars…so hardly the “best” interchange in existence.