• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s because practicing engineers (as opposed to road safety researchers, who are silo’d in academia) are obsessed with Level Of Service (LOS) for cars to the exclusion of all other concerns. Cyclists and pedestrians are a joke to them, whose safety is to be afforded lip service, at best.

    Traffic engineers are people who would demolish a thriving main street to build a six-lane 55mph highway and have the utter gall to call it an “improvement.” The entire industry is fundamentally fucked up, working from incorrect premises to achieve incorrect goals.

    (Source: I used to work as a traffic engineer.)

    • menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The engineers try to fulill the goals defined by politicians. Change the goals and they change the methods (like in other countries where the political process is not as closely definded by oil and car industries).

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        A lot of them aren’t given the problem of planning a city, its more like" hey this road is busy, design a bigger road since its so busy". But then their superiors belittle and threaten to fire them if they recomend building a tram line instead of 6+ lanes of car traffic. “The tram line isn’t by the book”, “we aren’t some experiemental urbanist city” or “the projected level of car service isn’t adeqaute for our predicted car traffic using models where the only transport option is driving”

        • menemen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          People in this sub seem to vastly overestimate the authority traffic engineers wield…