return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 17 days ago‘Frightening to consider’: fears grow over Trump’s threats to political foeswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down16
arrow-up1113arrow-down1external-link‘Frightening to consider’: fears grow over Trump’s threats to political foeswww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 17 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down25·17 days agoHa! Of course the liberal media doesn’t talk about all the times Harris called the her opponents fascists. That’s equivalent right? Name calling?
minus-squareMyOpinion@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up30·17 days agoThat is because it is a fact Trump is a fascist. It is not name calling.
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·17 days agoSorry, thought the obtuseness was a good replacement for /s but we are kind of living in a post-intellectual era. In other words my original reply was ironic.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 days agoI’ve got a pretty good sense for these things, and yours is certainly a case of Poe’s law, because I’ve heard nearly the same exact argument used in all seriousness many times.
Ha! Of course the liberal media doesn’t talk about all the times Harris called the her opponents fascists. That’s equivalent right? Name calling?
That is because it is a fact Trump is a fascist. It is not name calling.
Sorry, thought the obtuseness was a good replacement for /s but we are kind of living in a post-intellectual era.
In other words my original reply was ironic.
Ah ok. Hard to detect that these days.
I’ve got a pretty good sense for these things, and yours is certainly a case of Poe’s law, because I’ve heard nearly the same exact argument used in all seriousness many times.