• apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 days ago

    Good news! Roughly 1% of US people surveyed in 2025 voluntarily identified themselves as transgender, and since a great many in the US would be too scared to reveal this info about themselves, the number may be substantially higher. But let’s work with 1%.

    So it would seem like cisgender folk are at least ~10x as likely as trans folk to do mass shootings :)

    Do I think that being cisgender predisposes you to mass shootings? No, obviously. But the narrative being imposed in media is that being transgender does do so.

    • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      @Gladaed@feddit.org it would appear our instance is defederated from yours, so I’m unable to reply directly - no parade being rained on, you’re 100% correct and I’m quite aware of the issues with small sample sizes and small populations having wild variance.

      Just an insight into my thought process, I left out discussion of any rigorous statistical analysis as I didn’t think it was necessary to get into the weeds to retort the “unless trans people are significantly greater than 0.1% then this chart isn’t a flex” statement, which read to me as dismissive of the ongoing media narrative around transgender folk at best, and transphobic at worst.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Seemed just uninformed and durdlely, but receptive to feedback. I.e. a good discussion, after all.

        Defedded for tankyness/antisemitism discussion, iirc. Or us being “pro genocide/zionosts” which was a perspective pushed by db0 and was highly contested in other instances.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      Sorry to rain on your parade, but when you deal with low sample sizes you must check the T test. Just comparing centages does give bad results easily and intuition fails humans constantly.

      Or quote a rigorous source.