Replying to your own comment an hour later to yell about astroturfing, then making two more comments to swear you aren’t mad about being called a sockpuppet. Totally normal, unbothered behaviour.
yeah why would it bother me to have a rampaging brigade of Carney stans jumping down my throat for asking why they are defending Stephen fucking Harper. Good job
I’m responding to the fact that there are a bunch of downvotes on a post asking why it’s fine for Carney to chum it up with Stephen effing Harper on the basis that it’s not Poilievre
what’s weird is they (well, most) pretend not to. It’s amazing that people are defending this mostly on the basis that it’s the NatPost reporting it — like, what do they think the Post’s secret evil game is here?
I have asked what people think about this beyond the fact that the article is from the Post, and have not received a single response criticizing Carney. Perhaps you’d like to be the first?
so … we have a hard-right PM and that’s cool because he wore a red shirt instead of a blue one? Trying to wrap my head around the logic of any of this
Liberal geniuses owning the … libs? Hey Lemmy me thinks we have an astroturf problem
Are you replying to yourself here?
They forgot to change the sockpuppet account.
i was responding to the downvotes lol jfc this liberal cult
like, if i had any sockpuppet accounts (I don’t) then don’t you think there would be evidence of that. fucking Carney cult brigade
Replying to your own comment an hour later to yell about astroturfing, then making two more comments to swear you aren’t mad about being called a sockpuppet. Totally normal, unbothered behaviour.
yeah why would it bother me to have a rampaging brigade of Carney stans jumping down my throat for asking why they are defending Stephen fucking Harper. Good job
hey look at me, the person with “sock puppet” accounts that for some reason don’t upvote my comments
regular buncha sherlocks in this thread
I’m responding to the fact that there are a bunch of downvotes on a post asking why it’s fine for Carney to chum it up with Stephen effing Harper on the basis that it’s not Poilievre
(I think the people who like Carney also like Harper)
what’s weird is they (well, most) pretend not to. It’s amazing that people are defending this mostly on the basis that it’s the NatPost reporting it — like, what do they think the Post’s secret evil game is here?
The comments rightfully criticizing the National Post are not defending Carney, stop conflating the two. Do not share Postmedia, always downvote.
There is a single comment in this thread endorsing Carney’s action, which deserves pushback, but you’re lashing out at everyone else for no reason.
I have asked what people think about this beyond the fact that the article is from the Post, and have not received a single response criticizing Carney. Perhaps you’d like to be the first?
sorry everyone didn’t know that’s against the rules
Sockpuppeting is frowned upon everywhere. You just destroyed any credibility you might have had. Well done.
hello, genius, i am using the same account and asking why replying to my own comment is somehow not ok. how is that “sockpuppeting” lol