This assumes a) passwords, and b) poor passwords at that.
Passphrases are easy to remember, extremely hard to crack, and easily customisable for every site, and you don’t need no fucking password manager to store them.
Though I’ll give you this: password managers are not, after all, necessarily single points of failure.
If you need a password manager to manage your passwords you’re a much more vulnerable point of failure than your password management bloatware itself.
My brain. A password manager seems like a completely unnecessary single point of failure.
https://www.tomsguide.com/us/password-manager-pros-cons,news-19018.html no
This assumes a) passwords, and b) poor passwords at that.
Passphrases are easy to remember, extremely hard to crack, and easily customisable for every site, and you don’t need no fucking password manager to store them.
Though I’ll give you this: password managers are not, after all, necessarily single points of failure.
If you need a password manager to manage your passwords you’re a much more vulnerable point of failure than your password management bloatware itself.
Or you could not have to remember all of that, have vastly more complex passwords, have it be significantly more convenient.
I currently have 100+ passwords stored in my password manager, do you actually expect people to remember 100+ unique phrases?