unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 个月前Misgendering does not rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1627arrow-down126
arrow-up1601arrow-down1imageMisgendering does not rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneunlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 个月前message-square67fedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up10·8 个月前Yes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.
minus-squareGlytch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·8 个月前Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren’t actually people, so you don’t have to worry about dead naming them.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 个月前Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.
Yes, but actually no. Using deadnames of companies is much more acceptable than for people.
Despite what the Supreme Court will tell you, corporations aren’t actually people, so you don’t have to worry about dead naming them.
Deadnaming is not necessarily misgendering. Sometime people have deadnames for reasons other than gender.