• BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The problem with brands is you have to know the brand to know if you’re paying for quality or advertising, or both. There are plenty of big brand name products that are not worth the price, but there are plenty that where the price premium is reflected in the quality of the product.

    Unfortunately everything has to be on a case by case basis. I generally favour generics but there are a few branded products that I will go out of my way to buy.

    A treat example is Pyrex. It used to be a mark of quality due to the material they used to make their plates bowls etc. Then I got sold to some big conglomerate and they switched to cheaper less heat proof material. Now Pyrex is just a shitty legacy name slapped on crap, but at a premium price.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the same for a majority of brand names historically considered “premium” (tools, electronics, etc). The brand gets bought explicitly to bleed it dry by aggressively cost cutting and outsourcing to make a massive short term gain; until enough people learn the brand has been poisoned and raped.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Good brands such as Costco (Kirkland) and Wegmans here do that work for you and well. I’ve never had a product that was noticeably expensive without the value.