WMF is hiring a law firm known for busting unions in other Big Tech companies.

      • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        This sounds stupid, no offense. Because Lemmy has people post the same articles across multiple communities, so on ibish, are there going too be dozens of duplicate articles and then huge gaps for other topics??

        I think ibis would be beneficial if there “central” database would act more like a RAID of storage where petiole could commit storage space to a redundant database. Make it like a raid 0 but of you had 100 contributors, it would gain additional redundancy for stability and accessibility. It’s be like 25 “copies” or pools in raid 1 with another 25 in raid 0 to make 50 each or 100 total if that makes sense.

        That would create a highly available database as if there are servers worldide or nationwide.

        • laut_sprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You are implicitly raising the question of consensus though. If i host an article on my instance and you host the same on yours, who gets to say which one is correct?

          • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Exactly. Could someone get bad information? Yes. If mine is wrong and I don’t know yours is right, if the database was shared/redundant, you’d make corrections to your which would update mine too.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is why we need sector based unions rather than site based.

    They are far more effective than site based unions.

  • Imma put on my tinfoil hat for a sec. Considering how wikipedia exists and survives on the back of public good will, I can’t see how this is anything other than an intentional attempt to kill free information.

    think about it.

    Grease a few palms and some megacorp gets their patsy in charge of the biggest free and open repository of information in existence. Then it’s only a matter of time before that institution falls only to be replaced by a worse service that harvests your data while demanding a monthly subscription.

    • wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair and blunt, Wikipedia does have a lot of internal community and structural issues which would only benefit the enshittifiers in the long term. Luckily there’s now a decentralized encyclopedia called ibis.wiki which is running on ActivityPub.