• DempstersBox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    According to the article, it’s depleted uranium.

    Which is the leftover part that’s not useful for making nukes with.

    Still radioactive, it’s basically hazardous waste… That weighs more than lead.

    So you put it in munitions, and the same size projectile has more force, more stopping power. So you get more damage out of each round, plus convenient disposal of toxic waste, plus the radiological contamination around your targets, which either ties up more resources or gives the people you’re shooting at cancer later. Or both! Or your own guys! veritable carnival of excitement

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      DU is far less radioactive than natural uranium.

      EDIT:

      According to the article, the uranium found gives off between 8 to 24 microsieverts (µSv) per hour.

      Let’s take some real world examples and compare:

      A transatlantic flight typically exposes you to 0.08 millisieverts (mSv), or 80 µSv.

      Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ionising-radiation-dose-comparisons/ionising-radiation-dose-comparisons

      This means that you would need to stay next to the piece of Uranium for 3,5 - 10 hours to get the same dose as one transatlantic flight.

      Is it bad? Sure! Is it a crisis? Nah.

    • Womble@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      But this is weird because drones arent projectiles in that sense. This is pretty much equivalent to putting very slightly radioactive lead ballast in a drone. All it is doing is slowing the drone down and reducing it’s range. Very odd.

        • Womble@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Its a terrible way of doing that though, if you wanted to do that there are far lighter materials (i.e. you can carry more) and you’d disperse it as a powder from altitude.

          Like I said, its weird.

        • Womble@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ah, I misunderstood. Its a missile ON another missile (the one way drone) for shooting down other drones that try and take it down and that missile has a usually tungsten fragment warhead which is being replaced with DU.

          Still weird but not completely baffling in that case.

      • felixthecat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The drone is a kamikaze drone. It delivers the warhead and destroys itself.

        The uranium is armor piercing. That’s why they use it.

        • Womble@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          As I said, drones arent projectiles in that sense.

          A uranium (or tungsten, or even jacketed lead) dart hitting a target straight on with a sharp point while going multiple times the speed of sound is armour penetrating. Just putting a heavy metal in a subsonic aircraft carrying high explosive does nothing to help it penetrate armour and likely would impede it.