• Floon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It sounds like you don’t know how tech works.

      That the hardware can run some software is not an indication that it is flawed or vulnerable in any way.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I was an embedded systems lead professionally lmao

        Microcontrollers can be locked down and have fuses burnt so you cannot reprogram them

        • Floon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          So you don’t ever get to update them or fix bugs without entirely new hardware… yeah, all the counties around the country can afford that.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            This is a voting system, not a sign at the bus stop

            Security is paramount

            It shouldn’t even be electronic in the first place

            • Floon@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              You say that as if you know the setup of how computers are used in elections. You should check your county, to see if you can get certified as an election observer. It’s very educational.

              The computers used in elections have highly controlled inputs: no network cards, disabled USB ports, very restricted access by limited, accountable people. They are constantly tested for accuracy, with everything logged and inspected. Security is the most paramount thing, and you’re talking like only you care about it.

              Human counting is far less accurate, so the “no computer” notion is just stupid.