Ottawa’s reaction to a new Chinese law on ethnic unity is tepid and does not live up to Canada’s promise to stop foreign governments from threatening diaspora abroad, a Uyghur rights activist said.

The law, which Beijing enacted in early July, gives a legal basis for the Chinese government to prosecute people or organizations outside China if their actions are deemed to harm the progress of “ethnic unity.”

“It is a textbook example of transnational oppression,” said Mehmet Tohti, executive director of the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project.

“Our reaction to China is fading away, day by day, week by week. And then we don’t hear too much about transnational repression or gross violations of human rights.”

China says the law promotes harmony among the country’s 55 ethnic groups, who make up just under nine per cent of the country’s 1.4 billion population. The law mandates the use of Mandarin Chinese as the primary language in education.

The law says all Chinese citizens have a duty to “forge a common consciousness of the Chinese nation according to law and the constitution.”

It may impact minorities like Tibetans and Uyghurs, who have protested Beijing policies in the past, including through violent means.

Canada’s ambassador to United Nations agencies in Geneva, Peter MacDougall, listed the law along a series of issues that Ottawa is watching, in a June 16 statement to the United Nations Human Rights Council, responding to an annual report on human rights worldwide.

“We are also concerned about the ethnic unity law in China, and call for respect of the human rights of minorities,” he said, while also touching on unrelated issues in Afghanistan, Iran and Ukraine.

Tohti said he’s stunned Ottawa had nothing to say about the risks of the law being used to persecute people in Canada and elsewhere.

“It is a vague and very weak statement,” Tohti said. “The nature of Chinese transnational repression, that dimension is almost ignored. And that should be the key focus for Canada.”

Tohti said there is particularly a risk of China issuing arrest warrants that could see people arrested if they travel to countries with extradition treaties with China such as South Korea. Already, Hong Kong’s sweeping national security law has been used to issue bounties for activists abroad, including in Canada.

He said Ottawa should mount a global effort to protect Chinese dissidents from the law, but he fears the government has given up on publicly raising human rights issues ever since Prime Minister Mark Carney’s visit to Beijing in January.

Tohti noted the Carney government made transnational repression a priority when it hosted the G7 summit last year.

“We should be playing a leadership role. Now we almost drop all of this important leverage from our agenda, and so we are talking softly now. We don’t talk too much about China’s human rights,” he said.

Deputy Conservative Leader Melissa Lantsman called the law “oppression with a legal stamp” by the Chinese Communist Party.

“Beijing’s new ‘ethnic unity law’ is just the latest tool in the CCP’s playbook of control, from crushing minority rights at home to menacing Taiwan abroad. Authoritarianism doesn’t stop at borders with this,” she wrote on the platform X.

The European Union and the U.S. State Department have said they will not allow the new Chinese law to be applied within their territories. Canada has not explicitly said that.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    And as more people grow up with better lives, less will be radicalized.

    Even if we say those 15 years had a good quality of life. That still means no adults were born into that.

    • TimothyOilpants@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      So how many lives are a reasonable cost while we wait for these people to get their shit together?

      Estimates put the Han Chinese civilian death toll at 1000.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        They’re all Chinese or at least that’s the goal.

        So why differentiate with Han?

        Also it’s because it’s a lasting peace. You can look at Europe’s fight against the Jew for how oppression doesn’t work.

        How did Christians get rid of paganism? A soft approach, put a cross in their place of worship and after a few hundred years they think they’re Christians. Celebrate their customs, winter solstice is about a jolly fat guy and you get gifts. Which one do you think people picked?

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It seems short sighted to generate animosity between two groups you hope to unite.

            How many Han have the Han killed? That should show why blaming the group over the individual doesn’t make sense.

            • TimothyOilpants@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              This isn’t petty street violence, it’s a targeted, ideologically motivated campaign that has armed, foreign funded militants targeting a civilian population.

              Should Ukraine have simply acquiesced to the Donbas Peoples Militia and Russia?

              If America starts arming Alberta separatists, should we just give them what they want?

              • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Ukraine would be the Uyghurs if we want to compare because they’re the minority.

                Zhuge Liang conquered the south by winning their hearts. He knew force would result in further rebellion.