A reminder folks: people engage in this kind of radical protest because it works:

Results of two online experiments conducted with diverse samples (N = 2,772), including a study of the animal rights movement and a preregistered study of the climate movement, show that the presence of a radical flank increases support for a moderate faction within the same movement. Further, it is the use of radical tactics, such as property destruction or violence, rather than a radical agenda, that drives this effect. Results indicate the effect owes to a contrast effect: Use of radical tactics by one flank led the more moderate faction to appear less radical, even though all characteristics of the moderate faction were held constant. This perception led participants to identify more with and, in turn, express greater support for the more moderate faction. These results suggest that activist groups that employ unpopular tactics can increase support for other groups within the same movement, pointing to a hidden way in which movement factions are complementary, despite pursuing divergent approaches to social change.

  • drkt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    And if they hadn’t done it, those jets would’ve landed on time and other jets would’ve taken off and absolutely nothing would have changed about the total net carbon gain. Protests work, they get people talking.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not all protests are equal.

      All this one did was get people to hate the guy who slowed down the airport.

      • drkt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        https://drkt.eu/files/protesting.webp

        Also they literally didn’t do it so maybe read the article

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          Kind of proving my point here.

          One guy did nothing and still managed to get arrested. Makes the whole movement look silly.

          Completely the opposite of the situation in the cartoon; a well organized protest that actually reaches the leader.

          Thanks for helping me show how dumb the plan was.

          • drkt
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Okay I’ll bite. What is your solution?

            Apathy didn’t work

            Peaceful protesting didn’t work

            Scientific inquiry didn’t work

            Political petitioning didn’t work

            How many must die to climate change before you’re personally willing to accept the idea of a harmless but disruptive protest?

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              bootlickers don’t want people to come up with other solutions, they just want to point out the ones they know will work are inconvenient. Also, their fee fees got hurt when people point out they’re bootlickers.

              • drkt
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Stupid debate tactic.

                The people I’ve personally turned to my cause, and the evidence that it works broadly are what makes me think what I’m doing works.

                I’ll get ahead of your next argument (are you really convincing anyone by being disruptive?): Yes. When I disrupt traffic, I’m not trying to convince the people whose everyday life I’m disrupting by adding 10 seconds to their daily commute. Rather, I am expecting them to be completely and utterly intolerant of me and my cause such that they stir themselves up and look unreasonable. If a bystander sees this dynamic play out, me being calm and my opposition having a baby tantrum in public, who do you think they’re gonna side with when the conversation goes wide or even makes the news?

                Now you. What is your solution?

                • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Although there is little empirical support for negative radical flank effects, a number of correlational studies support the positive radical flank effect hypothesis (11, 13). But other empirical tests find no evidence that radical flanks increase or decrease support for moderate factions within the movement (14). Thus, the radical flanks literature has yielded inconsistent findings.

                  From your paper.

                  So the author and I agree that this is theoretical at best.

                  • drkt
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    This debate tactic of ignoring most of what I said, nitpicking a portion of it, and making me defend it, when it was you who was asked a question, isn’t going to work on me.

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Actually invconveniencing people is secondary if you’re still able to get press coverage

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              4 days ago

              You get the press coverage. It’s “Idiot Wastes People’s Time.”

              If they bother to read the whole story, they think, “he wasted people’s time for that?”