No, if you can’t of you don’t know, then ask first. It’s not that hard. You’re being neurocapacitist and neuronormative, because despite the fact that I don’t know if the Anon is neurodivergent (and I don’t truly believe that he is), that statement goes implicitly against neurodivergents.
Also, you’re missing totally the point: there are all kinds of people, and checking out someone else is NOT intrinsically bad.
That damaged her? Hell no. Then it can’t be reasonabily considered bad, because that’s the only objective measure scale possible for “badness” and “goodness”.
No, if you can’t of you don’t know, then ask first. It’s not that hard. You’re being neurocapacitist and neuronormative, because despite the fact that I don’t know if the Anon is neurodivergent (and I don’t truly believe that he is), that statement goes implicitly against neurodivergents.
Also, you’re missing totally the point: there are all kinds of people, and checking out someone else is NOT intrinsically bad.
That damaged her? Hell no. Then it can’t be reasonabily considered bad, because that’s the only objective measure scale possible for “badness” and “goodness”.