Does it perhaps have the "remote control session" feature that Spotify has when logged in on multiple devices? I've ditched Spotify but am still looking for a platform with this feature.
Adding ice is just filling your cup with 60% water. Filling the same cup with the same drink and no ice would be less profitable because you'd wait longer to order another.
It's not. Roundabouts work better than intersections.
The whole game can even be read as propaganda against car-centric traffic management, because road planning just becomes a nightmare at some point that incentivizes you heavily to diversify into public transportation and even walkable city blocks.
Home Office can also really suck if you don't have a dedicated workspace at home. Spending 10-12 hours at the same place with no reason to leave the home for days can really fuck with your emotional state.
the bigger issue is that generally people think men are evil by default, and women are good by default. and that's not a cultural assumption most folks are willing to look past.
I consider myself a feminist and I vehemently disagree with that take, nor does it reflect in any way the commonly held views in the relevant communities.
Women and men are people. All people hold the capacity for good and evil within them. The real differences are 1) our respective socialization, and 2) the way we are perceived and treated by society based on our gender. That's not an individual issue, but a systemic one.
I've been part of a few support groups for men that regularly received appreciation from women specifically because they were aimed at helping men in recognition of this fact, and thus didn't revolve into inceldom and gender war nonsense.
So in short, this question could have been used in all sorts of ways to provide an answer that clarified the commenter's position.
I mean, in the way it was asked not really. It was explicitly asked, or rather condescendingly demanded, as a simple binary choice stripped of all context.
That's not how you engage with someone when you actually want to get their take on a complex issue. That's how you engage if you want to score an easy win for upvotes. And I for one am done with that kinda hostile "debate bro" culture / popularity contest that's defined many subreddits over the years. It shuts down any chance for an actual exchange. So let's not act surprised at the result.
I know it's a quote. So considering that nazis are a subset of fascists, what's "LMAO" about saying that not all fascists are nazis? It is a simple logical conclusion of the first statement.
The question itself was a cheap gotcha. Shockingly, it's not as simple as that as I've been pointing out. Which you'd acknowledge if you were arguing in good faith.
It's unfortunate that any attempt to insert some nuance automatically makes me the enemy in your simplistic position on the matter. And now ego prevents you from backing off of this kind of thinking by any means, no matter what toxic and regressive conclusions it takes you to.
I didn't say the people of South Korea are being subjugated. Not sure how I could have made clearer that these are two separate issues.
You also won't find me defending NK. Not everything should devolve into tribalism and dunking on whatever we perceive as the other team. Which is exactly what I'm criticizing about this question and the way it was asked.
Yeah this makes total sense if you never ever think about it.