• 1 Post
  • 892 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年4月6日

help-circle


  • zbyte64@awful.systemstoFuck AI@lemmy.worldEthical Art AI
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    their argument is so broad it ends up also applying ti things like photography.

    That’s what you said, so I take it as: if I give a definition that includes Photography, it will be regarded as too broad. But I went ahead and gave you part of a definition anyways.

    What I said is that Art is not a commodity. I will grant you that “wanting things” and “getting things” is a form of human expression, but it is not art, that is exchanging commodities. If you can express a Generative AI scenario where someone draws upon their “values” instead of their desires then you might have an example of art. So in your library scenario, what “values” are behind their desires for “digital art”? Or is this person just wanting a certain aesthetic?



  • Hold up, you think the definition of art is too broad if it includes Photography but not broad enough if it doesn’t include Generative AI? Based on that I don’t think it is possible to give you a reason you would accept.

    This conversation of “art” reminds me of the difference between “value” and “values”: https://davidgraeber.org/articles/value-the-antropological-theories-of-value/

    If someone want high quality digital art, teaching them crochet doesn’t help them.

    This is a statement of “value” not “values”. That someone wants “digital art” but there is no connection being made to their “values”, they are simply getting what they want.

    Art is not a commodity, AI is.









  • zbyte64@awful.systemstoFuck AI@lemmy.worldEthical Art AI
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 天前

    At our library we teach people how to do art, including crochet. If the person is able to go to the library then they aren’t being gatekeeped from learning art.

    My alternative? AI art isn’t even art so at this point we’re just debating what is a better skill: crafting or prompting.






  • Regardless of the team size, I say simplify as much as you can so you can dedicate your resources customizing what makes their business special. You mentioned a PBX system and no infrastructure, this makes me think you talking about Customer Management. It sounds like you’re documenting as you go, fantastic. Maybe loop in a noob time to time to review the documentation or have a Q&A that reifies the docs. Best of luck!