Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)Z
Posts
1
Comments
1580
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Some people provide translated subtitles and the app does have a built in translator function. I found it's enough to converse, but definitely niche.

  • I haven't been banned yet, but then again I save all my shitposts for the fediverse and stick to book reviews on RedNote.

  • The rules being "idiotic" is a different issue from whether using pre-existing assets as placeholders is okay. For instance, one could argue that genAI, even during the concept phase, is an unfair advantage like taking steroids for a sports competition. For the purpose of fairness they have a blanket ban on genAI, not simply because "AI bad".

  • Like I said, when talking about morality you're talking about a subjective perception of value. All the other issues I mentioned, like them not following the rules, have objective criteria to say "yes they broke the rules". If your perception of authenticity includes gathering inspiration not from the originator but from a tool that samples art for you, then you would obviously conclude the end result is authentic. If however you define authenticity as something uniquely in the domain of the living, then they would not agree with you.

  • She changed her last name to not be associated to the guy. I can at least respect she doesn't want to be defined by her opposition to her father.

  • I would say that this is conflating different issues. The original issue is whether or not the entry followed the stated rules, they did not. Then you brought up whether using any tool at all is cheating or plagiarizing, obviously it is not. Now we are on a 3rd issue which is whether using genAI for placeholders is actually creative, obviously it is not because it isn't part of the final creative product. And a 4th issue as to whether using AI is a "sin" or not, that is less obvious not because it depends on one's moral framework and their values. For instance, if one values authenticity then they would likely agree using AI as part of the process makes a less authentic product, while someone who values profit or time more than authenticity would not see an issue with its use.

  • Most humans can learn on the fly though. If they see people taking turns at a broken stoplight they're likely to follow that example.

  • It makes stonks go up

  • Annoyed Maintainer: fine, here's a Docker file. Stop filing bugs about how you can't install node.

  • I didn't expect a photo of trump to get released in the trove but here we are. They then went back and removed that single page after it was released.

  • Yeah, that's exactly what I am saying 🙄

  • Did genAI help you write this response? Because that would explain not understanding the difference between using tools to be creative and using tools to plagiarize.

  • You won today's most contrarian person award. The prize is food served by someone who hasn't washed their hands because they want you to have a strong immune system. To claim your reward please cross the nearest freeway on foot.

  • Part of being wealthy is you don't know if someone loves you or is being nice because they want something from you. It's incredibly isolating at an emotional level.

  • To be fair, it doesn't take an intellectual to dislike Drumpf

  • To be fair, it doesn't take an intellectual to dislike Drumpf

  • Did I stutter? Aiding in the production is aiding in the competition.

  • If we're following the chess analogy the developers are allowed to use AI to train their skill but not to aide in the actual competition.

  • If we're following the chess analogy the developers are allowed to use AI to train their skill but not to aide in the actual competition.

  • politics @lemmy.world

    What were they thinking when they chose this to be the thumbnail?