I grew tired of all of them and I’m using mullvad leta. Too bad they don’t support images but it’s the only one without ai. It’s not perfect and it crashes if you use “site:” but so far it’s working for me better than the others.
You don’t need to use vscode, any text editor is fine. Try to follow the getting started tutorial on microsoft’s website to see if your dotnet configuration is correctly installed.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/get-started
Jetbrains Rider free for personal use. You must use .net (core) on Linux, it works like a charm. Visual studio code is fine too but you need tons of plugins to have an IDE experience in .Net. You might have a problem with your .net installation id you can’t compile a simple program. How did you install .net? From microsoft’s ppa?
I don’t think Gecko is a requirement for the addons. The Orion Browser supports (many but not all) Firefox’s addons and its webkit. So it is feasible although probably hard to obtain a 100% compatibility. I still use Firefox on Ios because I prefer the UI but not all sites works well with it. Also the ios team at Mozilla is very small allegedly based on some public threads on the internet.
Oh wow thanks I didn’t know it, I am an iphone user since only recently. However most limitations come from ios limiting background services so I’m not sure how different this one is. Möbius also added experimental support for synching photos which is my main use case and I will have to investigate if sushitrain support this feature.
Don’t forget also the need to keep up with new web standards otherwise they will quickly become irrelevant due to not being able to go on new sites and I don’t think that will be possible without another company/foundation funding and taking over the project
It's in the article :
"Samsung’s Auto Blocker feature takes things a bit further.The feature, fully blocks the installation of apps from unauthorized sources, even if those sources were granted the REQUEST_INSTALL_PACKAGES permission."
Why is the post title so click bait when the article only talks about mutation testing which is just a specific testing technique? A lot of testing is still done manually not even automated, it might be possible to automate test suite creation with generative ai and it's already being done in the field but nobody really want tests that might be wrong which is the whole point of testing.
To me this says more about Canonical than Rust.