Listen, I know it's not a popular take, but software projects and services of any size require a sizable amount of effort and time - these projects are vulnerable to acquisition, abandonment, commercialization, and enshittification without support.
Linux wouldn't exist as it does without the large amounts of commercial funding it receives because it just so happens to be useful for enterprises and cloud services.
Firefox was the shining jewel of the open source community, but even they're struggling with public perception issues and staying true to their original mission.
Plex has been under criticism for the last year over various UI/UX concerns and have had developer layoffs as recently as this month.
The Affinity series of products have been replaced with a free version that requires a Canva account and will probably become more enshittified as time goes on.
How many social media services have come and gone or have had increasing user dissatisfaction as time went on due to enshittification and waning financial stability? Tumblr, Twitter, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr, Facebook, Instagram, and more. The newest bastion is BlueSky, but I guarantee it's just going to become the next Twitter in enough time.
Don't get me started on Windows 11.
I'm on Facebook because of the network effect, and if there was a way to encourage it to become a better service, the pricing is reasonable, and if I get what I want - yeah, I'd pay it.
And I'm not speaking from lack of experience - I offered my own social media service for a time that offered privacy and extra storage for a price. Not one user paid, and I had to cancel the project after losing money. Good intentions alone get you nowhere.
I mean, do I want to give money to a billionaire? Not exactly.
On the other hand, if we don't start supporting premium software services and open source projects, the enshitiffication trend will get worse.
(I know Facebook isn't open source, but I've seen enough open source projects abandoned or enshittified due to lack of support from users.)
I have to choose among my principles, and I'm strongly against user-hostile UI/UX paradigms, enshittification, and other downward quality trends in software/services.
Honestly, if this reduces user-hostile UI changes for paid accounts, and I can get a chronological feed of just friend activity with original content, I'd pay it at this point.
(I know there is supposed to be a friends-only feed now, but it's not even close to being friends-only still.)
It's a big if, and I don't think it will be what I want, but I'm just putting it out there that I would pay if the experience is valuable enough.
There are some factors to consider. Some of the Deepseek quants are based on Llama 3, whereas others are based on Qwen Reasoning.
You're also not going to get the same quality of the full ChatGPT experience comparing a 7B parameter model to a 500B+ model like ChatGPT.
Regardless, it's difficult to run the actual Deepseek R1 model as there's not a true quantization or distillation of the original model.
You can also try GPT-OSS if you want an open source model comparable to ChatGPT. Once again, you're going to have to balance the size and precision of the model with your expectations.
I second GitLab CI/CD - it's a CI/CD system that just makes sense to me. That doesn't mean it doesn't have its complexities depending on your needs, but I've overall enjoyed my time working with it.
selfh.st - dockcheck: A CLI Tool for Updating Container Images
Deepseek R1 and OpenThinker are two more examples. There's also SmolLM, which I believe also open sources its training data and ensures proper licensing for it.
I have a similar perspective. I built my own in-home AI server because I assumed if the technology had any staying power, I better learn how it works to some degree and see if I can run it myself.
I'm keeping an eye on Ollama's service offerings - I don't think they're in enshittification territory yet, but I definitely share the concern.
I still don't believe the other LLM engines out there have reached an equivalent ease of use compared to Ollama, and I still recommend it for now. If nothing else, it can be a stepping stone to other solutions for some.
Replying to myself to follow-up.
Listen, I know it's not a popular take, but software projects and services of any size require a sizable amount of effort and time - these projects are vulnerable to acquisition, abandonment, commercialization, and enshittification without support.
I'm on Facebook because of the network effect, and if there was a way to encourage it to become a better service, the pricing is reasonable, and if I get what I want - yeah, I'd pay it.
And I'm not speaking from lack of experience - I offered my own social media service for a time that offered privacy and extra storage for a price. Not one user paid, and I had to cancel the project after losing money. Good intentions alone get you nowhere.