I'm surprised the article omits Trumps early direct threats to Canadian sovereignty. The article talks about people not believing the threats and then proceeds to talk about threats to other nations.
It's understandable, but the author is caught into the same problem that he sees other in. Something that was safe, or at least benign is now actively harmful. It's hard to wrap your head around that kind of change.
Is Canada going to build the independence that it needs to truly stand alone from then up to the US as this continues.
When Mexico is invaded, what will the reaction be?
I mean. I think he's crazy, but for Trump to reach out to a random celebrity that he knows the name of and just start talking about state secrets is completely in line with things that already happened.
Zip disks at least the 100’s had the same tactile qualities, little door to fidget and label space all while having that satisfying clicking sound each time you used them.
No. It’s not acceptable at all to have feelings. No one will care in a positive way if you do as a man.
There is no acceptable outlets for emotion as a man.
This is way weird political shit gets so much traction as it is considered to be acceptable to be angry at idea you don’t agree with,hate an opponent or other and you are allowed to be happy at the pain you bring them.
Everything else is shut up you don’t know how good you have it or shut up you don’t know how much worse it is for someone else.
I know that linux is the popular answer to this problem.
I use a Mac and it's a pretty good machine. I know it isn't for everyone, but it works well enough for me and has enough mainstream support. As well the hardware has gotten ' good enough'
MacOS is not hostile to me when I want to run and install programs. There is some opensource support on the platform and the a good amount of closed source programs.
I do miss the wide ranging PnP hardware support for things like SAS/LTO
Thanks. Realize the kind of answer I gave won’t win me ‘points’ .
realistically if I could do that for my kids I would. I think lots of wealthy families do, only when the opportunities are media facing does it get backlash.
There isn’t a social media page devoted to farm families passing down multimillion dollar businesses as a matter of fact.
Life isn't even close to a level playing field. The family you are born into had the greatest effect on your future success than nearly any other factor.
I mean likely.
I live in a better school district than most and have time to spend to help my kids with homework. I usually attribute all kid success to kid efforts. Don't foresee myself as an adult going full narcissist and claiming credit,even partial, for the kid success.
It would be up to them to publicly acknowledge what they had other didn't. Otherwise it's kneecapping their achievements.
The box from my isp doesn't support bridge mode. Maybe I am having the double nat problems?