• 3 Posts
  • 1.04K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年7月25日

help-circle
  • Again, nothing but weak polemics. You know nothing of my background. Even a cursory glance at my comment history would have told you what sector I work in, and the last time I covered for a colleague was two days ago. Something tells me that the accusation of “you don’t do shit for a living” was more projection on your part.

    Furthermore, it’s quite telling that your first thought when fishing for a name that evokes psychological expertise was Phil McGraw. I don’t need to have any expertise in the workings of the human mind to identify that red flag.




  • What a sad projection of your own hollowness of self, to say that the very idea of changing corrupt systems of exploitation is synonymous with being incapable of critical thought. I hope you find something to fill that gaping hole in your selfhood.

    We may all be nothing but drops in an ocean, but what is any ocean but a multitude of drops? To dare liken the idea of taking a day off of work to turning the sky green is so pitiful, so utterly incomprehensible a strawman, that it can only have come from someone who is, themself, forcibly repressing their own higher thoughts.

    Please consider your positions (for it is clear that no consideration has occurred thus far).


  • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workstomemes@lemmy.worldHow to use PTO
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 小时前

    “There is an order to the world” is a phrase uttered only by those enjoying the current order as applicable to them, to someone whom they clearly see is not enjoying the same. It is the taunt of tyrants, slavers, bigots, strike-breakers, fascists, and genocidal maniacs the world over.

    Order alone is not an axiomatic good, and anyone who treats it like it is inherently worth protecting, or like an orderly system is an invalid target for criticism solely for being orderly, is either naïve or is experiencing an unbalanced “order” in their favour. I’ll let other readers decide which they think you are.




  • You do realize that “a surveillance state where the government knows how much money and holdings everyone has” describes the entire basis of the tax system, right? The government already knows that information. So, you’re saying that you are so concerned that the government would suddenly know how much money everyone makes, and that the better solution is institutionalized governmental corporal punishment leading to permanent disability and death?








  • If they were only selfish, but smart, they wouldn’t be voting for politicians whose demonstrated aim is to reduce their constituents’ wealth and funnel it into a class of people which their constituents have zero chance of ever joining.

    No, they’re dumb. They’re certainly also selfish, but that’s because they’re dumb and can’t comprehend the value of helping someone else, because the feedback loop on that mechanism has more than one step before they receive value back, and because the value received is most often in intangibles.




  • To give additional options, because Stephenson and Sanderson aren’t everyone’s cups of tea (producing insanely large tomes like Reamde, Cryptonomicon, and the Way of Kings), you may also consider the following, which are either hard scifi (requires few, if any, scientific discoveries we currently lack), speculative SciFi (requires one or two unexplained leaps of scientific advancement, but thoroughly explores the mechanics and consequences thereof), or speculative fantasy (any magic system is internally consistent, operates in particular ways, and the interactions between them are explored)

    1. Adrian Tchaikovsky, creator of the most - realistic alien species in literature: Children of Time Series (Spec. SciFi (but only barely), Tyrant Philosophers Series (Spec. Fantasy), and an insane number of standalone stories among the three genres listed above, such as Alien Clay, Shroud, and And Put Away Childish Things
    2. Dennis E. Taylor, for those with crippling reference-itis and enough of a science background to want the author to regularly presume the reader’s knowledge of plate tectonics and special relativity: Bobiverse Series (Spec. SciFi, but only because of “subspace” and optoelectronics), Outland Series (Spec. SciFi, because the portal’s function is never explained)
    3. Andy Weir, who makes every book a high-school science class (in the best way) with a plot: The Martian & Project Hail Mary (Both Hard SciFi, and I’ll fight anyone who tries to claim that the astrophage makes PHM speculative), also, several short stories, including The Egg (Spec. Fantasy) and James Moriarty, Consulting Criminal (Historical Fiction/Mystery)
    4. David Mitchell, who is like if James Michener wrote historical fantasy: Cloud Atlas (Historical/Speculative Fiction), The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, the Bone Clocks, & Utopia Avenue (all Historical Fiction with Minor Fantasy Elements)

    If you want something more in line with YA, but with hard magic systems, consider “The Will of The Many”, by James Islington, or “Sufficiently Advanced Magic” by Andrew Rowe.


  • Never heard of her, her irrelevant song, “attacks” on her, or anything that would make her stand out from the rest of the toiletpaperUSA bumblefucks, but I’m glad that you find it profound that some random person on the internet who paid money to an ethno-nationalist illegal immigrant for a blue checkmark thinks that there’s a connection between criticism of a random bigot and music sales! It’s VERY interesting to keep track of random “records” that require no less than three qualifying statements! Do you have any fun facts about the most decorated member of the US Armed Forces who is also a woman, and for whom none of those decorations are the Purple Heart? Or perhaps do you keep track of the male athlete who has won the most national titles, but never scored a point in any of the title games? I think we would all be interested in this random person’s unfounded root-cause analysis of those peoples’ achievements to precisely the same degree as we are interested in this random claim about the causes of popularity for “the longest-running, non-holiday #1 song by a female artist in billboard’s hot 100 history (since 1955)

    After looking it up, even that “longest-running” wording is bullshit, because they were nonconsecutive weeks. If the Simpsons were cancelled, then brought back after a season, it wouldn’t hold the record that it does.

    What a sad joke.