It’s that capitalist policy of murders and acquisitions.

It’s visual pollution anywhere. I cannot for the life of me fathom why anyone finds that style appealing to begin with.

Small government has only ever meant minimal regulation. It means nothing when it comes to civil rights or liberties.

Eh, then you just get those idiots who avoid using TODO: because it makes the code review “harder”.

// This is a broken example.
// Note: remove X before doing Y

I bought some half-inch silicone feet to separate mine from the shelf it sits on. The added airflow underneath seems to do just fine.

I recently installed OPNsense specifically because I had to buy a mini PC with 2.5 gig ports. There simply isn’t anything reasonable on the market for the prosumer above the 1 gig threshold. Running splendidly on a Beelink EQ12.

Also, OPNsense has things OpenWRT doesn’t offer (plugins, IPS, etc.)

There’s no qualification to be a developer to access github though, I think is what the person you responded to is saying. It’s entirely possible for a user to end up at github without a true understanding of its purpose. Therefore, it would be helpful if it was more clear to the average non-developer user that what they’re looking at is a code repository and is not meant for general consumption.

You forgot the switch.

Not according to WAPR

Sometimes I forget what I was looking for and have to restart the mental loop when doing this.

ChatGPT is mediocre in a silo. It has no context for distributed systems and will never compete with real developers. The benefit of ChatGPT is the time it will save a good developer from writing boilerplate. Nothing more, nothing less. Anyone who says otherwise is bitten by the bias bug.