No one is saying they output of an llm is copyright (this is a different debate).

What people are talking about is they stole copyright work. They pirated from torrent sights mass amounts of data. That’s the violation at problem.

Wasn’t that Linus sebastion who said that, not torvalds?

I can’t tell if you making that joke with (not) sarcastic?

Hegseth called a child fat in a cadet photo.

So this Photoshop is making fun of what hes so proud of, a rusty bucket of bolts

No one is saying hes on the level of gates or jobs or whatever.

But that doesn’t make him an angel either. It makes him human.

He famously took a year off because he wanted to work on how toxic he was.

The comment was never meet your hero’s. Hes a good guy, but if you have had to work with him, you may be leas inclined to agree whole heartily.

I think this is exactly the disconnect: not everyone shares your vision of what the internet should become.

What’s really funny to me, is you go on this say that your vision is ‘correct’. Clearly people disagree with yours. Please stop using chat gpt to sound more inflated than you already are.

Not everyone wants it to be more populated for population sake. Why should I care how many MAU we have.

You say you want the good parts, but chat got isnt telling you how to keep them. By keeping it small. If you want large and popular, go back to reddit. Not every place has to be the most popular.

deleted by creator

Used devices are a thing.

Also, what are you doing on your phone that ypyve noticed a performance difference in the last several years?

Nothing I know anyone in my life, does anything with their phone, that one from 5 years ago couldn’t so just as well (with proper software updates, like graphine).

Tl:;Dr why do you need the latest phone?

It did end for 10s of millions of people.

I dunno, trans people seems to be pretty fucking popular, and doesn’t stem from religion. Before them it was immigrants…

These people have been conned, just because it was done from a religious end, doesn’t mean if we got rid of religion, people would suddenly be rational. There’s absolutely no evidence to support that thought. (Cite me if I’m wrong).

Your blaming the method, not the people.

Not the person, but get off your high horse, and either explain what you mean, or shut up.

Thats a lot of words to say nothing of value.

Out of what, large scale, battery is available?

I haven’t seen one yet. Tons of prospects, none deployable on the size of say, the north american grid.

I mean sure.

But I’ll also point out the comment wasn’t there wasn’t any reason, but a logically sound one.

Hence why I said its not logically sound to say era of cheap battery storage, because thats not our current reality.

So sure, there’s other points, but none worth discussing?

Gonna need a source on the age of cheap batteries.

All large scale batteries are chack full of rare earth metals, which are not named for their famous availability.

Canada developed reactors to run on waste fuel from other reactors.

CANDU 9 IIRC

Not them, but having read this entire thread, what contra points?

Other than that, I haven’t seen much in this thread.

I see a few points of how Frances configuration for cooling may not be good, but that’s not an unsolvable problem?

At least more solvable than the energy storage problem.

Physicist, not an engineer.

You need baseline and demand power.

Renewables like wind and solar are great for demand. As they provide power typically when usuage is peaking. But those power outputs drop when its needed most, so you still need baseline power.

Nuclear power is great at baseline, but because it takes a lot to ramp power up and down, isnt great to handle peak loads.

Notice the team up here?

Why is it always renewables or nuclear. Both have their places.

This solves the energy storage problems as well. Less of a need for batteries with rare earth metals that are… Finite.

The only people looking to expand open source to mean things like open weights, are the same as people looking to have AI be a thing.

You know the steam you see at a power plant is not the steam you use to generate power right?

Otherwise why don’t aircraft carriers already fume steam like that?

Because the steam in a reactor is closed loop. Meaning there’s just what you need, not an excess in generation.

The steam you see from a power plant is a separate cooling loop.

Aircraft carriers likely just use the more plentiful, and cooler, sea water for cooling. Meaning they don’t have any excess steam to use for the catapult.

There is plenty of generated steam for other systems, but this is probably done via electric boilers, not as an excess by product of power generation.

Not an an expert by any means, but this is just using my logic and understanding from nuclear physics, from my physics degree.

Why is it waste on a nuclear aircraft carrier.

There’s a giant electrical generator that has steam yes, but you have way more electricity than stream, before other benifits.

As a Canadian, who has contributed to us being the biggest consumers of kraft Mac and cheese world wide, I think were to blame here.

Ai disclosure?

You should as a rule read community rules before posting your projects.

Your missing the disclosure in your title