• 53 Posts
  • 316 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 2nd, 2025

help-circle


  • I wonder if a personalized reputation system based on your votes of other people’s comments, and influenced by votes from folks who have earned enough upvotes from you, could be developed without turning your feed into an echo chamber like Facebook.

    Sort of like PageRank, but for fediverse users instead of web pages, and with each user keeping (and seeing) their own rankings of everyone else.






  • Geany is excellent. It’s a lightweight programmer’s editor with enough features and configurable hooks to provide the important parts of a full-blown IDE. It renders text clearly, never feels laggy, and doesn’t get greedy with your RAM. I recommend it to people who can’t stand the bloat that’s often seen elsewhere these days, but would rather have a GUI than resort to vim.

    A couple minor annoyances to me:

    • It doesn’t yet support the Language Server Protocol, so any language that it doesn’t understand will be left without syntax and context-sensitive features. (On the other hand, it does support a lot of languages.)
    • It inherits Scintilla’s use of Gtk for its GUI, so it’s an alien app on Qt-based desktops.

    I use it anyway, because I find it easier / more comfortable to use than Kate.


  • I suspect zram’s swap device only consumes RAM when it actually contains swapped pages, but I don’t know for sure. Can anyone link an authoritative statement on this?

    I use it on a 32 GiB workstation, also with PERCENT=50 and ALGO=zstd in Debian’s /etc/default/zramswap, and vm.swappiness=60. This is its only swap device. I like that it avoids needless SSD wear and painfully slow interactivity during large compile and compression jobs.

    Is it worth it on your system, which has only 2 CPU cores? If your memory-intensive workloads compress well, then I would think yes, for the same reasons that I like it. If you find your CPU struggling with it, you could always change to a lighter compression algorithm.

    On the other hand, if your memory-intensive tasks don’t compress well, then no, I would not expect it to be a good use of your CPU.

    You’ll never know until you try it. I suggest checking the output of zramctl when running tasks that create memory pressure.



  • Sorry; I shouldn’t have written Cloudflare specifically. Their CAPTCHA page now contains scripts from Google, not Cloudflare. I have corrected my comment.

    How do you know this?

    Because a couple months ago, archive.is/archive.today started showing me CAPTCHA pages instead of the archived articles when I use Firefox with scripts disabled. The current page contains scripts hosted by Google, which I won’t enable, so I can’t read the archived articles.

    What about https://ghostarchive.org/?

    I haven’t used that site enough to have a consistent picture of what it’s doing. When I tried it a few minutes ago, it directed me to a CAPTCHA wall when trying to submit an article, but not when searching for an archived article. I’ll try to remember to look at it again periodically, to be able to answer this question in the future.


  • She told me she’s […] also thinking about a version that doesn’t require JavaScript, which some privacy-minded disable in their browsers.

    As someone who is keenly aware of the privacy and security problems that come with allowing web scripts, I hope she prioritizes this soon. It’s really disappointing to find sites that were formerly readable without javascript suddenly inaccessible since adopting Anubis. The more sites that do this, the more people are pushed toward enabling scripts by default, exposing them to a great many trackers and web exploits that would otherwise be blocked.










  • I won’t watch the video, but as someone who has been running Windows games on Linux since well before Steam for Linux existed, my view is that comparing performance on different distros is pointless these days.

    Game performance depends very little on which Linux distro you use, because sufficiently recent versions of the performance-sensitive components are available on all of them, and because gaming runtime environments like Steam and Flatpak provide their own versions of several of these components anyway. (Also, desktop environments have generally become good about turning off expensive compositing operations while games are running.)

    Pick whatever distro is comfortable for you to use and maintain. That might be bleeding edge Arch, or low maintenance Debian, or user friendly Mint, or whatever. They can all play games very well once they’re set up for it, and the setup is almost never difficult if you’re willing to learn how.

    As for comparing Windows to Linux for running Windows games, I would expect performance to be close enough that the difference doesn’t matter in most cases. Game-focused Wine builds and API shims like DXVK are already very capable, and continually improving. Windows might have advantages from being a game’s native platform, but Linux has advantages from resource efficiency.

    So, a review “showing almost no difference in performance between gaming distros and Windows 11 LTSC” doesn’t surprise me at all.

    My opinion: the gaming performance differences these days are mostly minor, and less important than having my computer serve me (not some invasive corporation).