Fair enough, I think yours is also a valid interpretation.
I just want to clarify: with "just be happy" energy, I meant the tendency of people to suggest seemingly simple fixes to others struggling with mental health. Even, if they work for oneself and even if it works statistically (for example sport is a good habit against depression), it feels like talking the problem down. But that is highly subjective of course.
I just commented on how I personally perceived the comic. I also said that I believe that the comic was made with good intentions.
Ultimately, I am just someone on the Internet. I have no illusion that my comments here matter. Though, I do have first and second hand experience with depression and suicide if that matters, which it does not.
And yes in many ways I am extremely privileged when it comes to this topic, e.g. my healthcare insurance is not tied to my employer as I don't live in the US. I would like to know how that has anything to do with my comment above though.
Quitting your job, potentially losing your shelter and food supply is a hell of a risk. Presume one actually wants to get better, they first need to be well enough to handle such a risk. Otherwise, they are homeless and suicidal: A great recipe to get well /s
I do believe this was made with best intentions but it has major "just be happy" energy and is made from a position of privilege.
Just getting a therapist for example is a huge battle. Having supportive friends is not ubiquitous. Changing jobs is risky and in certain financial circumstances almost impossible, especially with dependents.
That said I approve of the message that without living there is no possibility of things getting better. My advice is to focus on small maybe even tiny victories daily making lifestyle changes where possible.
Your reply begs the question which definition of AI you are using.
The above is from Russells and Norvigs "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach" 3rd edition.
I would argue that from these 8 definitions 6 apply to modern deep learning stuff. Only the category titled "Thinking Humanly" would agree with you but I personally think that these seem to be self defeating, i.e. defining AI in a way that is so dependent on humans that a machine never could have AI, which would make the word meaningless.
The fundamental idea to use matrix multiplication plus a non linear function, the idea of deep learning i.e. back propagating derivatives and the idea of gradient descent in general, may not have changed but the actual algorithms sure have.
For example, the transformer architecture (that is utilized by most modern models) based on multi headed self attention, optimizers like adamw, the whole idea of diffusion for image generation are I would say quite disruptive.
Another point is that generative ai was always belittled in the research community, until like 2015 (subjective feeling would need meta study to confirm). The focus was mostly on classification something not much talked about today in comparison.
Something similar? I read a picture wrong going of a fact I've heard before.
I was just lazy I give you that. I did not double check but after someone pointed the mistake out I gave better numbers.
So how is that similar to what happened before? My main point wasn't that I distrust the numbers they are posting but the way it is not backed up with good explanations and/or potential causes.
Reading back this comment does come off as overly defensive but I am genuinely confused what I did that is similar and how I should've behaved better in the face of my error.
That was such a culture shock when I went to the us for the first time.
In Germany and many places in Europe do not think of burgers as sandwiches. I was so confused when I ordered a sandwich and got something like a burger.
I expected something like this. My confusion must've been quite the sight, the waitress even seemed concerned. Tasted great though.
Das ganze hat wirklich mir jeglichen Spaß an Sport genommen. Erst viel später habe ich Gewichtheben für mich entdeckt.
Da kann ich mir soviel Zeit lassen wie ich will zwischen Sätzen und mein eigenes Tempo wählen. Ich muss nicht schnell sein und habe keine Angst durch Unfähigkeit andere zu benachteiligen wie im Teamsport.
Ich glaube wirklich dass es für jeden einen passenden Sport gibt. Es ist nur für manche eine riesige Qual herauszufinden welche. "Probier einfach welche aus" hört sich toll an, aber bracht auch extreme geistige und teilweise körperliche Ausdauer.
In meiner Schule gingen diese Tabellen bis zur 6. Also auf dem paper stand das man mindestens so und so viele Liegestütze braucht um durchzufallen.
Geiles Gefühl wenn man gesagt bekommt, dass man zu schlecht sei um ne 6 zu bekommen.
Auch waren die Tabellen extrem anders zwischen Mädchen und Jungs. Nicht ein bisschen sondern extrem. Das hat man auch im Notenspiegel gesehen. Oft was bei den Jungs nicht mal für eine 5 gereicht hat war eine 3 oder gar 2 für Mädchen.
Ist CB Funk nicht unverschlüsselt?