Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
0
Comments
326
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I'd have appreciated them integrating Google reader with Gmail instead of killing it off

  • No surprise. Nobody talks about new Google projects any more, since the assumption is they'll be gone in a year.

    Edit: Not even hyperbole. This very article states Keen was launched in 2020 and stopped receiving updates in 2021. They shelved it in literally a year.

  • It's a shitty situation, but that doesn't preclude it from possibly being beautiful to look at.

  • That sounds like it would look really lovely. Got any pictures?

  • How are the dogs surviving / getting fed?

  • Probably because they didn't know WHICH type of mercury you had. Organic mercury can kill on touch with a single drop. Best not to take chances.

  • Fix the misogyny

    Are you expecting a tiny village in the middle of nowhere to accomplish what the entire western world has not yet been able to do?

    focus on lifeskills and a labor market that isn’t dependent on crop yields.

    You do realise your food isn't grown in the grocery, right? It has to come from somewhere. By your logic, we should eliminate all farming and starve.

    That aside, they're a tiny village. Probably little education. How, exactly, do you expect them to upskill themselves?

    They’re measuring success in brides

    They haven't had a marriage in a decade. They're literally looking at the death of their community.

    The lack of empathy and any sort of ability to see things from a viewpoint other than your own privileged one is astounding.

  • It's a farming village, what do you expect them to do there? It sucks for them, but they don't have many options

  • It's a traditional island thing, what are you talking about?

  • Wikipedia notes that the likely cause is a neurotoxin. Apparently it's an area of little research, though.

  • with what little i kno of haiti, i would assume the power figures in haiti government are just as corrupt as those everywhere else and that removing their corrupt hold wouldn’t be a bad thing

    The guy is a former member of a govt kill squad who got expelled for excessive violence and brutality. That should tell you something about him. There are worse things than corruption in govt.

  • Are there incidents of overseas Chinese not listening to the Hungarian police? If not, what's the justification here?

  • The classic example, and trope namer, comes from farmers overgrazing their livestock on the common pasture. This stretches back to way before hypercapitalism was a thing. For that matter, the concept has been discussed as far back as Aristotle, millenia before capitalism was even a concept. There is no requirement for the tragedy to be reliant on capitalism to exist, and is a standard component of game theory. Even the article itself (except for the clickbait headline) does not make the argument that it does not exist, but is entirely about how to prevent it from happening.

  • The tragedy of the commons is a known behaviour that we can see daily everywhere. How exactly is it a myth? The article is entirely about ways to AVOID the tragedy and husband the shared resources in such a way that we don't engage in a race to the bottom. I agree with 90% of the article, but it feels like they decided to go for a clickbait title.

  • The features of successful systems, Ostrom and her colleagues found, include clear boundaries (the ‘community’ doing the managing must be well-defined); reliable monitoring of the shared resource; a reasonable balance of costs and benefits for participants; a predictable process for the fast and fair resolution of conflicts; an escalating series of punishments for cheaters; and good relationships between the community and other layers of authority, from household heads to international institutions.

    Somehow the author extrapolates this into 'Tragedy can be avoided, therefore it doesn't exist and is a myth'. What is this ridiculous logic?

  • It's not a sustainable model, OP just wanted to see how many people would put their money where their outrage was

  • They offered $1.50 in Nov, got rejected, then came back in Feb and successfully bought the company at $0.50? Man, that's some negotiation skills. Either that or the board should be fired.

  • That's an interesting clarification. Never heard about it (and I'm guessing most other people didn't either)

  • What does good faith have to do with anything the big companies claim?