do you have the specific vendor model handy? Maybe it could help soemone else with the exact same model board (vendor supplied clock and voltage properties via VBIOS).
This may be at odds with stability somewhat being rolling release, but you may want to check out SUSE tumbleweed or EndeavourOS. You already have a solid pick based on your established requirements.
Couldn't hurt to poke around other offerings in a VM, though
Yeah, they're vastly different approaches, and despite my admittedly petty complaints, I'm eternally grateful for both; to me it feels as if both GNOME and KDE in some way cater to the creature comforts of MacOS and Windows respectively, and for end users hopefully moving on from both of those environments.
I find both KDE Plasma and GNOME can be made into serviceable experiences with enough time, and given the nature of FOSS and such, automating this as part of a custom deployment is a fairly trivial task in 2025 😊
I use this on specific systems but plasma's information architecture (namely within the settings area) is bizarre to me. Yes you can search. No you shouldn't have to resort to that.
I'm not keen on the little 'K name everything' in joke either, though thankfully you can rename desktop shortcuts to whatever you'd like there.
I can appreciate that people use their systems very differently, but this is something that gnomes designers did not care to acknowledge throughout that whole exchange; input directly from their end users, and that's bearing in mind they collect no telemetry.
I appreciate working in UX for a community driven project is no easy task, many of the people commenting in the thread linked above could be considered more advanced users with their own desktop shortcuts configured, and a one size fits all approach satisfying all is difficult to deliver. All they asked for was an option for this new behaviour.
The communication in that thread was so poor that matt miller got involved.
Haven't run the comparison on NV33 versus 44, but if find the 5060 series kind of interesting given the area and transistor count increases relative to ada lovelace.
33 was a full node behind and priced high for what it was (even if BOM was mostly in-line).
I wouldn't be surprised if something like that was the case. Could have been that the successive work was negotiated with khronos & lunarg before the final name was chosen.
no u