WelpGuess I need to look for another way for my auditing desires.
On the other hand, considering such a thing can be easily done using htop, I'd suppose it would be possible to add such a functionality to auditd (to include the whole tree and full executable paths).I feel like this functionality has considerable merit and would make the file access rules much more useful.
This distracted me back then. This distracts me now.Who would've guessed that people who filled everything with scented stuff in school would grow up to be adults that use scents to fix all problems?
Minor body odour distracting the guy next to you? Fill your body with odorant that now makes anyone in the whole room nauseate.
Body stinks of whatever you smoked during the break? Noone can tell if everyone's nose is blocked.
Chinese mousepad made out of non RoHS compliant rubber, has residual industrial volatile compounds causing nausea? Well, the room "freshner" can cause more nausea. Fill godowns with the perfume and nobody will notice the Chinese rubber.
Ok, so I did a thing with git and checked the audit log with ausearch -k test-key.Then I got the ppid (say 2000) and then ran ausearch --pid 2000, which gave no output, while doing ausearch --pid 2000 just gave the same entries that I got from the previous one.
So, unable to get the process tree that way.Perhaps there is some setting I am overlooking?
Honestly, I would find it more easy to believe that this is a big ploy to stockpile computing and energy resources, while making the general public think that all the rich are fooling themselves.
I find it hard to understand how they can actually believe their hubris, by placing all NN and ML stuff into a single category, regardless of methodology and variation in resource consumption between previously successful and ongoing cash-grab projects.
Also, this company was making train controller HMI for another country. They were going on for hours, spewing buzzwords like, "secure", "safe" and "mission critical", but then somehow ended with AI.
Wait, I just realised you are the same person that gave the original reply to my comment.I thought you were playing bokeh in which you ignore the main point of the comment and instead make fun out of another aspect of it and act like you are saying that seriously.So I replied in kind and dubbed the normal physical keypads of the older dumb and then feature-phones as "fancy" and then acted as if the number actually had to be shown in alphanumeric to match what was written.
Don't tell me you were being serious when you said that the ny free security suite was going to send you to someone that would fix your problems (unless your problem was having too much of money).
Yeah.I have even seen them. Those machinely metal bones with multiple hinge and pivot joints hold the flimsy duralumin wings together while providing much needed actuation, using hydraulics.
So here's the thing.In my phone, when I type a phone number, it is a number and does not contain alphabetic characters.So that thing that it is asking you to call, isn't callable. Even if you have a fancy physical keypad that has both letters and numbers on the same keys, they still enter numbers when you try to type letters in the number field.
Wings without a structural element are pretty useless for flying.Even mosquito wings have structural elements, enabling them to not only flap, but also rotate.
For a human wing to work, it would require extremely strong structural elements to sustain the loads required to lift the human.
So I recently gave an interview to which, the last question of the product manager cum tech-lead was about how I use AI.He then specifically asked if I used CoPilot and my negative immediately made him start sighing all over the place.There seems to be some kind of a push coming from somewhere for these things.
I didn't know one could call a random IT helpline and get stuff fixed on Windows.My experience was, either find a workaround or a paid software that did the thing, or live with the bug.
Space games: Why not both?