Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
2
Comments
1655
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Grapes

    Jump
  • That was the joke yes.

  • I’ve done that before. It sucked cause it was also 14°F out. So I had to drive home in the cold while wet.

  • Also no scammer would not take the opportunity to scam more people.

  • They are from SIM card farms.

  • Grapes

    Jump
  • They look angry.

  • Please do explain how it’s wrong. Go on, I’ll wait.

  • Meta Is Being Sued Over Whether WhatsApp Really Encrypts Your Messages

    No, they’re being sued over whether Meta can read your messages, not whether e2e is implemented. I covered this in a different comment the other day, but these are not mutually exclusive, which is why Meta can be completely truthful about e2e encryption being on and yet the lawsuit can still be correct.

  • If you could link that it would be great. As far as I understand it, a commercial passenger plane (which holds several hundred people) is no where close to being possible. If you are talking about small planes that hold maximum ten-15 people then sure.

  • The efficiency doesn’t matter (to a point of manufacturing solar cells, or wind turbines, or whatever your equipment is for your renewable energy source). If all of the gasoline is generated from the air using renewable energy, it could take 100x the energy and still be completely carbon neutral. Carbon neutrality is based on the amount of excess carbon added to the air. If no carbon is added then by definition it’s carbon neutral.

    Porsche already has a factory in Chile that is doing this exact same thing at a much larger scale.

  • Wait, so openai actually understands the meaning of removing consent? And this author clearly doesn’t?

  • I haven’t been able to report anything for a long time now. Not sure if this is only on my end or what, but it always fails to make a report.

  • The particulate matter won’t occur in a hydrocarbon that is generated, that comes from imperfect processing of crude. If you pull the carbon directly out of the air there are no particulates.

    But yes it will still be carbon neutral. No additional carbon will be released back into the atmosphere.

  • No they do exist! But most scientists agree that we are unlikely to ever see commercial airliners using it, nor will freight liners use it. We would have to see ENORMOUS scientific improvements and many many many things that seem incredibly far fetched invented to get to that point.

  • How about you go argue with the scientists calling it carbon neutral. My wife literally works in the field. It’s called carbon neutral.

  • Coke makes more sense than pop, since coca cola was literally named after the term.

  • What.

    The.

    Fuck.

  • It’s not worse. It’s carbon neutral (as long as the energy source is renewable like the sun). Any carbon it takes in will be released exactly back to where it was. It’s a much much better option than digging up oil.

    On top of that, there are currently no likely possibilities of replacing gasoline for things like planes. So replacing their gas with carbon neutral gas will improve the situation by 100%.