Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
2
Comments
4
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Innocent from the perspective of the person who is sharing. They intended no harm, they did not want to get involved in somebody else's agenda.

    You clearly view the photograph in a different context, and you see harm. That's fine, but if you're going to bring that context into other people's communities, you have to realize moderators may not want every person to be held to your standards. Hence the banning

  • Most of the risk comes from the processing and handling of the meat. If the chicken isn't perfectly healthy, and the butcher isn't very careful about keeping the intestinal tract from spreading, bacteria from the intestinal tract could spread to the meat.

    This is the same reason that you need to cook ground beef to a much higher temperature than you need to cook a steak, more surface area, more points of possible contamination.

    Is it possible to process and eat raw chicken safely? The Japanese certainly think so, it's a dish that's available widely in Japan.

    It's up to you, and your risk tolerances. But if you're going to do it, you have to make sure you source the meat cleanly, it's processed very cleanly, it's stored very cleanly. It's a high bar

  • I don't think this is a Lemmy world issue. I think on many instances you would also see the same behavior. Somebody sharing something genuinely, innocently, and it's being leveraged and twisted into a political moment. That discourages people from sharing.

  • > !carnivore@dubvee.org @lemm.ee

    Paper Discussion - Long-Term Intake of Red Meat in Relation to Dementia Risk and Cognitive Function in US Adults

  • > !carnivore@dubvee.org @lemm.ee

    Simple Minimalist Chili