I thought it was Britain directly, not Canada, that torched it

Chopped off? Ew.

Smash them with a fucking sledgehammer instead. Make it fucking painful.

You forgot all the failed Hitler assassinations, nobody cried over those either

I’ve tried talking and that doesn’t work, I’ve also tried being kind and all that shit no dice. But everyone gets upset when I say let’s shoot them, so please tell me more about how it’s my fault.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

That feels immoral if not illegal

Can someone help me? Is Mr WordPress just snorting a shitton of coke?

I’m fine with this.

As long as the team gets recognition in the more formal documents then let the media have whoever they’d like.

It’s like doing set up for a show. Let the headliner be the focus but acknowledging the people who made it happen is really nice.

Gotta love misogyny

Considering she is saying he divided the family and that Giuliani was pretty quiet before Trump, I think we should take it as a “we didn’t always agree but we were family and that came first”. Which if true is a terrifying possibility that mutant oompla loompa man is capable of splitting a family that badly. Reminds me of some civil war quotes.

I’ve talked with military members about fort and base renaming. The names are significant because they are named after (mostly generals) service members who are strongly associated with a set of tactics or strategies that the base specializes in.

So instead of fort Green beret you’d have fort “founding father of Green beret” or fort “I trailblazed the green beret playbook”

I still think we need to rename the Confederate name ones because fuck the traitors, but adhering to that naming scheme is important for the armed services.

Only 18 years? Should be the death penalty for Nazism.

asks a question

Fuck off I don’t care

Well which is it? Seems like a pretty important distinction. Also I did click and it went to beehaw.