

You can think of lightning: It is only visible for some 100s of microseconds (<0.5ms) but it is very well visible. Granted, a lot of photons are emitted in this very short though.


You can think of lightning: It is only visible for some 100s of microseconds (<0.5ms) but it is very well visible. Granted, a lot of photons are emitted in this very short though.


Where I live, 1Gbps symmetric is usually the standatd package around 40$/month, with 2.5, 10 and up to 25 available. Maybe ypu can find 100 or 500Mbps, but it’s only marginally cheaper (or even more expensive).
Do most people need it? Probably not though.


Okay, this comment section blew up.
I agree with the people pointing out that rich people encouraging veganism is hypocritical as hell.
But on the other hand, it’s kinda true. In the current system, it’s one of the best things to do, while also fighting to overthrow capitalism in the long term.
Also, you can be vegan and buy stuff like oatly, beyond and so on, or you can buy rice and beans. Either is better for the planet (and very much for the animals, probably also you) than meat, but the former a bit less.
Where do you make the cut though? Do basic GPU nodes count already? Do TPUs count?


That’s not good enough!


There are toothpastes with B12, that makes it very easy to not forget and my blood levels seem fine since over 2 years :)


Gemäss Allianz Pro-Schiene, soll diese Strecke vom Bund elektrifiziert werden: https://www.allianz-pro-schiene.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/260504_Karte-80-Prozent-Ziel-Streckenelektrifizierung.pdf
Ich denke mir einfach, dass so ein neuer Batteriezug auch nicht ganz günstig sein wird und es besser wäre, die Batterie stationär zu haben. Dann könnte sie für alle Züge genutzt werden oder auch für anderes. Aber vlt. geht es darum, eine Übergangslösung zu haben und Emissionsvorgaben zu erreichen.
Fairerwesie muss man auch sagen, dass die Züge ja dann auch auf anderen Strecken eingesetzt werden können, welche sich wegen geringer Auslastung nicht zu elektrifizieren lohnen. Mich wunderte es hier (ohne die Region zu kennen), dass eine Strecke zwischen zwei doch relativ grossen Orten nicht eh schon elektrifiziert ist, bzw. jetzt nur mit Batterie.


Was spricht dagegen, die Strecken zu elektrifizieren?


At least it’s actually an unpopular opinion.
it’s not like I expect every solarpunk to explain every win every post
I agree and only meant if you wanted to post in !solarpunk@slrpnk.net. Because in my opinion, it is about solrapunk theory and how services can be provided and governed. But it would need some context about theory, at least for me, since I’m not too deep into governance concepts.
I think it’s not about technology itself, but about (corporate) governance of tech companies and therefore not fitting very well in this community (but the post can stay imho). However, I find !selfhosting@slrpnk.net less suitable. To be honest, the main !solarpunk@slrpnk.net would be adequate in my opinion. Maybe it would need to be contextualized better: Why do you think this is a solarpunk approach to governance? Are there examples that work like that? What could go wrong? And so on to give it more depth and not just be a “news” link


Totally agree. There are some reasonable critiques regarding veganism, but mostly they are just issues with production in a capitalist system.


Rare Elsevier W


So, this confirms the horseshoe theory then?
Well, what did you expect?


Yeah there is for sure a strong luck element in it and it’s not exactly a fair competition. Also depends on the game mode. I like “hide and seek” best, but then every hider has a different starting point, but it’s interesting to see what they do with it.


Clearly Jetlag the Game


Drogenabhängigkeit verändert das Gehirn physisch
Klar verändert sich das Gehirn (auch physisch, was u.a. auch Depressionen begünstigen kann), bei gewissen Drogen einfach noch stärker, da chemisch direkt in die neuronalen Prozesse eingegriffen wird.
Aber es geht doch darum, negative Auswirkungen zu verhindern/verkleinern (analog z.B. Methanol bei Gebranntem). Es geht ja gerade explizit nicht darum, etwas zu verbieten, sondern zu regulieren, um den Schaden einzudämmen, was bei Drogen m.M.n. auch sinnvoll ist.
Für die Umwelt sind sind sie aber leider nicht so toll