Used before is way different than heard of. If I've used it before and liked it, sure I will favor that brand based on personal exp. If I didn't like it, of course I avoid it.
If I've only heard of it, that means absolutely nothing to me and I'm immediately skeptical. If someone has told me a brand is good, I'd consider it an informal review and it holds a small amount of weight.
Functionally, the brand is only useful for identifying and matching the products to the reviews and research I'd done on it, it's just a label.
If there's evidence, then it should be producible. A notepad with the imprint of the removed page. A hard drive with the deleted and recovered data. You don't get to hide behind the term 'forensic', saying 'trust us bro'.
Lmao I did the same thing today, trying to teach a particularly.. 'beginner' user how to sign into outlook. I was going to have them sign in again in front of me, but without my help. It wouldn't sign out so I just gave up
I just spent 2 hrs last night in my Kali vm, trying to find an exploit on a web server. It was running Laravel 11.30 and vulnerable to a URL query to change the env to dev. So yeah peak of mt stupid is accurate
Everytime I go back to IRC every channel is either dead, or one guy is there to yell at you for chatting 'wrong'. I wish it was as good as it used to be
Unironically this isn't far off. Wii Us are somewhat rare and sought after these days. It's one of the better ways to play Wii games on HDTVs iirc