That’d be fine by me, if I could also actually buy a good TV that supports DP.
On the other hand, I also think it’s bullshit that I pay for HDMI through both my GPU & TV, and the HDMI forum still denies me that bought functionality.
I mean, I agree. But I’ve waited long enough for a good OLED TV with DisplayPort. I don’t get why they don’t just add one.
When I click the link in the seedit repo, on the webpage it says “fetching ipns from ipfsgateway.xyz”
Not sure if this fits your usecase exactly, but LinkSheet can make redirection on android more configurable.
For photons, their moving relatively slow from the inside to the outside of the sun. Although, I think, it’s technically a bunch of photons bumping each other into existence.
Wikipedia is financially pretty stable, afaik. Not saying you shouldn’t donate, but you might want to look into what happens with it. It won’t necessarily be used to cover costs of running the website.
There’s really only one way to make sure no new ones come to be…
In retrospect, I have noticed. Thought it was badly compressed content.
It’s not the adapter I bought, but also seems VRR is lacking:
“VRR/G-Sync/FreeSync are not supported.”
Have you experienced otherwise?
I would kindly ask the HDMI forum to point me in the direction of a DP to HDMI adapter that supports VRR or FreeSync. They seem so motivated to gain more funds from royalties, surely they know how to persuade me.
Thanks for the tip. It says YCbCr420. Anything I can do to improve that?
Plenty of society’s after the 1600s, that had people and rulers who disagreed with that notion.
Haskell
The Dutch student loan program is gonna be in a lot of trouble… (Dienst Uitvoering Onderwijs)
Yep, I really hope a future will become reality where Adobe has some competition and/or an incentive to port the suite to Linux. I just can’t help but cheer on the sounds against Stockholm syndrome. So much of these “it doesn’t work on Linux” is just the company intentionally trying to prohibit integration with open systems (looking at you HDMI forum). In the end I agree, though, when giving advice, it’s best not to assume the “only gaming” use case.
From my experience it’s still a common misconception and I think it’s the largest potential group that can switch. Sucks that your usecase is unsupported, though. Just out of interest, what software can you still not run?
It’s been a while since I’ve watched it myself, but remember them going into the ownership structure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNZy603as5w
There’s basically no way for them to not make it a subscription model.
This is a pretty interesting counter example: https://www.eteknix.com/running-yuzu-on-switch-gives-you-better-performance-than-native-gaming/
But, as others have said, exceptions confirm the rule.
Thanks, that was an interesting read! I always felt IPFS wasn’t ready yet, but the value it tries to provide of being a file system, I’ve found no real alternative to. Very good to read that iroh is willing to look beyond the IPFS spec to provide its values with better performance. I hope it works out.
What explanation do people envision, after which they would both understand the mechanism of free will and are convinced it exists? That understanding just seems contradictory to me, so either it doesn’t exist or we can’t define it.