I use AI tools all the time. It works well under supervision for things that should be relatively trivial but not enough for a human to do it quickly. It is also nowhere near good enough for unsupervised programming. A lot of times it can't even get the commit messages right, which misleading commit messages are worse than lazy commit messages. See this official OpenClaw Nix repo, and as you can see it also struggles to do tasks as basic as making a readable README.md file, which the fact that it can't even do that convinced me that the entire OpenClaw project is snakeoil. For prompt injection vulnerabilities, even their own project has that:
Check if Determinate Nix is installed (if not, install it)
Now of course the obvious question many people might ask is “are they being truthful?”
Yes that is a large part of what I meant by what are their intentions. If you can reasonably conclude that their that their intended goal will probably involve progressively restricting this area of legislation (whether through implications from their statements or the possibility of them not being truthful), then it is not a slippery slope fallacy.
This is why I use AI for search now. Even with Kagi most of the results are massive hunks of either AI or human generated slop, so I might as well just generate the slop myself and get something more concise, and when the AI does do search it can filter through the bullshit a lot faster
You still need to know what to search, ideally have some background information on the topic and the sources themselves so you know what the sources are talking about and their reputation, read through a bunch of sources to find that most or all of their content is not relevant to what you're looking for, follow links to better sources, etc. It's easier if you're aiming to become an expert in something, but especially if you're starting from scratch or it's for a topic you'll never tough again, AI turns a 3 hour task into a 10 minute task for the same outcome. It uses less compute power than search engines to go to a library and ask librarians for books on a topic then read those books, yet people use search engines because it's much faster that way.
Well for example Wikipedia might link to a book that costs money or an article that's paywalled. Which for serious research it might be worth paying for but not for a random essay.
Learning how to construct logical arguments, do research that makes sense, and communicate effectively to the right audience, all of which AI writing sucks at.
The Dow the Dow right now, is over 50 thou