Wir haben das Problem schon und es wird schon auf praktisch alles angewendet, was nicht passt.
Ich mein, versuch mal ein einzies Thema zu finden, wo die Wissenschaft irgendwas Unangenehmes sagt und die Politik es ohne Widerworte und Leugnen akzeptiert.
That is the title from the news article. It might not be how good journalism would work, but copying the title of the source is pretty standard in most news aggregator communities.
Smartphone detection cameras are relatively recent and I pointed them out because they are the best solution that exists so far.
But laws against using your phone while driving, we had them already decades ago, and we had other solutions before the cameras. E.g. placing police next to the highway and letting them pull everyone out who uses their phone. We had that too decades ago. And that too works.
But it's not only that. There are posts all the time about Americans being surprised that speed cameras exist, that red light cameras cameras exist, that speed limits are things that can actually be enforced and so on.
Today there was even a post about some road being restructured with sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and shrubbery, and that was seen as something revolutionary by all the americans in the thread, and not something that the rest of the world has been doing since the 50s and that's already way outdated compared to what's happening now.
The US is a total backwater country where everything that benefits regular people happens 50 years later.
It's only an unsolvable problem if you haven't ever been to any other place than the US. Like so, so many things. I don't get why you guys keep thinking you have to reinvent the wheel, when the rest of the world has solved the same issues decades ago.
You know speed cameras? Modern ones can detect a phone in a hand. And they only store images of that when they detected law-breaking behavior, so they are fine in terms of privacy.
I’m going to c/politics. Yeah you sure are, buddy, you’re gonna see all those US only politics, because obviously "lemmy.world/c/politics" cannot be about world politics. US is the only place in the world that matters, right?
I mean, it's better than nothing, but it's not exactly a great conversion.
Both setups waste space like crazy that could be used much better.
They are using a roundabout as a slow-down area. That's ok, though not exactly great. The road leading up to it is still straight and uninterrupted, which means crossing pedestrians still have to deal with speeding cars.
There is a pedestrian crossing with an island, which is an improvement.
They added a road-center green space. These things are a total waste of space. They can't be used for anything. They look nice when driving by, but other than that, they do nothing. If they had moved it to the side of the road, it would at least increase the space between pedestrians and cars, but this way, it does nothing but increase speeding, because it separates cars from the oncoming traffic visually.
They added bike stands, but no bike paths even though there's more than enough space to do so.
They added two lights. Well... Better than nothing I guess.
Continuing with the motif of wasted space: That roundabout center island is a huge one.
Looks like a redesign by a rookie designer who has never been to a place that actually does it right. It looks like something that was built in the 60s in Europe.
Rechtlich (zumindest in Österreich) wird unterschieden zwischen "einen Teil der Wohnung untervermieten während der Besitzer dort wohnt" und "die ganze Wohnung untervermieten".
Ehrliche Frage: Was für einen Zweck hat das gesamte Konzept der Untervermietung eigentlich?
Das ist doch nur Scalping auf Wohnraum, oder?
Der Zwischenmieter tut nichts was irgendwem einen Mehrwert bietet. Der sitzt doch nur dazwischen, profitiert vom Kapital des Vermieters und der Not des Untermieters und bietet selbst gar nichts.
I usually try and pick up a console a few years after its done. Its usually cheap and the nostalgia wave hasn't hit yet. At that point its probably been hacked and the store shut down so I feel no qualms aquiring games however I see fit. Though there seems little reason to do so after the 360 and PS3 since most games play on pc too now.
That's what I do too, but there's a sweet spot. I got a bunch of New 3DS XL for the family just before the eshop closed, and I paid €80-100 for each of them. That made sense to me. But paying €300+ doesn't make sense to me.
DS and 3DS are hard to replicate well on a single screen device. So i get those, but there are newer handheld emulators with dual screens. Nintendo also keeps shutting down 3DS emulators so progress is slow. Vita emulation is still in its infancy.
DS/3DS emulation works well enough with a phone and a portrait mode controller attachment. That way you get the stacked screen layout and it's handheld too. And the screen is way better too, which is especially noticeable if you compare it to running DS games on the 3DS.
These old consoles are 100% better on emulators with stuff like fast forward, save states, upscaling and in the case of the mobile ones, decent screens.
In general playing games on original hardware is going to be a better experience than running it in an emulator.
Tbh, I think that depends. On the 3DS it does make more sense, you are right, especially if you want the 3D effect. That one is really not replicable.
On a New 2DS XL without the 3D effect, I don't know... Most games I played don't really use the touch screen a lot (though that obviously depends on the games) and a phone with a portrait-mode controller can replicate the dual-screen quite well.
Wir haben das Problem schon und es wird schon auf praktisch alles angewendet, was nicht passt.
Ich mein, versuch mal ein einzies Thema zu finden, wo die Wissenschaft irgendwas Unangenehmes sagt und die Politik es ohne Widerworte und Leugnen akzeptiert.