Skip Navigation

帖子
137
评论
66
加入于
7 mo. ago

My main account is solo@slrpnk.net. I'm also using the one here because I really like the feed feature.

Btw I'm a non-binary trans person [they/she/he].

  • I don't see anything surprising in what you describe. It is well known that Zionism uses Judaism as a tool for its settler colonialism for well over a century now. The Bund wrote anti-zionist songs at the time.

    Clearly, Judaism and Zionism are not synonyms, nor have they ever been.

    It is the Zionist state of Israel that tries to present Judaism and Zionism as synonyms. We shouldn't fall for Zionist propaganda / Israeli propaganda / Hasbara, call it as you want, these are synonyms. And this is why we need to call out both Zionism and antisemitism.

    Saying that Israel is a theocracy (...) because this is what the Jewish religion is, not only is an uniformed statement, it is also an antisemitic one. Israel is a settler collonial theocracy because of Zionist principals. (And the support from the West - meaning, the decendents of the christians and/or europeans that were procecuting Jewish populations for centuries. I won't expand on this now.)

  • I don't know what to say, for me it works.

  • Thank you so much!! This is so exiting!!! PieFed and all of you are the very best <3

  • I have the impression there is some sort of confusion, most probably I need to explain things better.

    In this post I had 2 questions, you reply in relation to the 1st one. To my understanding this one was solved. I am also wondering about the 2nd one.

    Here is an example about the 2nd one: In the following post see the thread starting by the comment of user gedaliyah. Notice it is present in lemmy, but not present in PieFed. At least for me?

  • Hi again, and thank you for taking the time with this post. I was wondering about the 2nd question in this post. It seems to me it wasn't mentionned in the comments? Copy-pasting it here to make things easier.

    • If I got this right, when the first comment of a conversation is highly downvoted, all the conversation that follows disappears. In practice, this means that everybody else's input is in a way erased, since at somr point it is not visible. I believe a bad initial comment that gets a thoughtful reply can be a great conversation starter with many participants. So I don't understand this approach neither.

    The way it is for lemmy seems fine to me. Everything is visible. Why make the whole thread disapear in PieFed?

    Edit: I just noticed that the flair solved was added. Should I perhaps make a separate post for the 2nd point?

  • This sounds like a very usefull tool for mods!

  • This is one of the recent reasons why the US supports the state of Israel, but it is on top of many more historical reasons. Don't get me wrong I don't mean justifiable ones.

    For instance: Zionism, British imperial rule exercising its power and then loosing it, wanting a foot in west Asia because the were trying to establish democratic institutions in the 60's-70's, to name just a few

  • I see things differently. Condemning genocide is not an arbitrary test related moral purity.

    And like Jewish Voice for Peace say:

    Never Again For Anyone

    as well as

    Not in our name

  • Whitout doubting what you say, from this last tweet it looks like the narrative (at least in this instance) has shifted? In the sense that this text seems pretty clear to me.

    No matter what, I hope the protest goes incredibly well!!

  • Just found a relevant site for the US, called:

    Methane Risk Map

    Tracking methane-linked health risks to communities.

  • Dammit, you are totally correct. Deleting this post

  • Of course the carbon footprint of the billionaires is nothing compaired to what the industry sector emits. My point was in relation to how the per capita emissions are used, not in comparison to the economy as a whole. While keeping in mind that it's big oil coined ‘carbon footprints’ to blame us for their greed, so that we focus on personnal choices, instead of collective action.

  • I would be interested in seeing the methodology behind that figure

    If you click on the relevant link above, you will find the report itself. You can even download the methodology note seperately.

  • The super rich are (...) a vast minority

    It seems to me that the math in this is overwhelming. If a single person in this minority emits in 90min more than an average person in their lifetime, we should take into consideration that their lifetime is made of many, many, many 90min slots.

    Apart from that of course I'm all in for sustainable living and redistribution of wealth for lower classes. Preferably abolish the class-system all together, of course.

  • The Nordic model's approach is relevant in imo, because this article is about Sweden, and because this path proved not be safe from capitalism taking over. This does not contradict what you said, that the entire world is electing right wing populists right now. It is a reminder that this is a mechanism that capitalism traditionaly uses to resolve its crises.

  • Yep. To my understanding, in the Nordic model, capitalism continues to devour all socialist tendencies.

  • I think it's non-binding, after all.