

The point is, this fetish for "migrants“ is first of all inhumane, and besides that also expensive and inefficient. It’s absolute brainrot no matter the amount of mental gymnastics politicians, media, and people like you are doing to justify it.
The point is, this fetish for "migrants“ is first of all inhumane, and besides that also expensive and inefficient. It’s absolute brainrot no matter the amount of mental gymnastics politicians, media, and people like you are doing to justify it.
Interesting framing to call the colonization and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians a "war of independence“
As opposed to India, the beacon of women’s rights. We just don’t like hatemongering
Imagine being Zionist in 2025
Got it. Thanks a lot for the explanation, pretty much agree with everything you’re saying, honestly my bad for assuming the worst. I think it was pretty hard to understand, at least for me, from the initial comment where this would be going and how immigrants would play a role so I mistook it for some right wing QAnon shit. Sorry about that.
We’re talking about Europe wanting to ban privacy and you barge in talking some shit about some immigrant conspiracy crypto war shit, nah man
I like the XMR community for being mostly a bunch of nerds and/or anarchists. You sound like a dick tho.
Fast! Deploy the trap card and spawn the blue eyes white dragon before him
Let me know how those mid terms went freshman! I know it’s exciting to be at university and all but you should learn to read the room
好主意 有人能带我到天安门广场吗? 我听说那里什么也没发生
Screenshot of Facebook boomer meme? This triggers me, quality shitpost
I think it’s good that you’re trying to back your claims by sources / papers but your response tells me that you’re not trained (yet) in reading papers critically. Those are just some random question that came up from the top of my head and that any scientist would ask if someone were to present the findings of this study at a conference. This kind of rigor, to not blindly accept results but to critically evaluate them and poke holes in the arguments is what makes academia academia. I’m kind of surprised that you throw around papers and then get offended if people don’t blindly accept whatever you say, it’s kind of an interesting appeal to authority fallacy.
Or might just have reported more vs others, which idk but would be similar to e.g. sexual violence statistics in Scandinavian countries where officially they have much more harassment etc. than other countries, but this is just because women are more encouraged to actually go to the police and report it.
I can’t be bothered to read the paper, but here are some evergreens that make this result hard to interpret:
Of course we don’t know any of that, but these psychological studies are difficult to conduct because in theory you’d have to account for these effects and in practice that might be impossible. But again, I haven’t bothered to read the whole thing just to prove a point.
I voted for Harris
Could this be any clearer?
I honestly don’t know anymore what to do with this blue MAGA bs. You can say that you ate Harris out while voting for her but you don’t agree with her pro genocide stance and because you said one critical word they’d still tell you that you made Trump happen somehow?
Porn is gone, party is over
Me whenever dog owners do that
Muslim is not a race and racism isn’t about car races, now say something not racist about Muslims.
I just told you why people are downvoting you that’s all
Is this really coming to Lemmy now? Jesus, wtf