Soweit ich weiß musst du alle Email-Adressen angeben, die du die letzten 5 Jahre benutzt hast. Damit kriegen sie den Rest schon raus.
Für mich ergibt sich die Frage wie gut sie darin sind aus den Adressen, die du abgibst, diejenigen rauszufinden, die du nicht angibst. Ich befürchte dass sie durch Palantir und co darin ziemlich gut sein werden.
The sign that it was vegetarian was very dull and not very visible.
Your story largely hinges on this subjective description. I've personally never seen a product that is a vegan/vegetarian alternative of something and does not center its whole branding/appearance around that.
I didn’t expect that as lasagna is made with meat.
Lasagna is a broad term for many a dish. You're probably thinking of Lasagna al forno, made with Ragu alla bolognese, which normally contains minced beef. If it just says Lasagna it could be any kind of casserole with the typical pasta sheets called Lasagna.
That was whole point of it from the very beginning. Dairy and meat producing lobbyist rejoice at the idea of the EU getting bogged down over regulating their competition. I think it's working out better than they have even dreamed it would.
People got your point the first time, it's just rubbish. Your stance of superimposed neutrality is what led in a race to the bottom in a lot of countries' cuisine. We can't act like every food is equally valid just because some outliers might fall through the cracks, thus protecting international mega corporations. Any regulation would be a net benefit for the population's nutrition.
And frankly even that is not a credible statement if you had to change your prompt 11 times to get it lmao. It's all bullshit unless you already know the facts around your answer.
To what page of search results do I have to skip to read something backing this claim of yours? Because frankly I got bored after reading 10 abstracts from the first page and no luck finding anything, but plenty of conclusions stating the opposite, such as:
Higher level of habitual physical activity is associated with a 31% risk reduction (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.61–0.78, 6 studies, N = 557,487 individuals) of community-acquired infectious disease and 37% risk reduction (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.59–0.70, 4 studies, N = 422,813 individuals) of infectious disease mortality.
Gosh they are cute!