Calling that Hitman bullshit "confusing" is way too charitable.
Not too long ago Steam listed something called "Hitman 3" (they changed it now).Imagine my surprise when it turned out to include only the game launcher, without any actual content that could be reasonably called "Hitman 3". If you tried to start a mission they redirected you to buy it first...
I was in a similar situation, I just told them I'm cancelling the account when they added the extra charge for extra users, and they're free to make their own account if they want.
There was a bit of complaining, but it turns out no one missed Netflix enough to come back.
Why is it your default assumption that everyone who disagrees with you is a middle aged white man?And why do you act as if calling someone that is an insult?
Well, yeah, it's not specifically the age that's the problem.
But you gotta admit, the original 79 wasn't exactly the pinnacle of anime when it aired, and it really shows by now.I actually watched it last year for the first time, and it was fairly difficult to get through.
Last I checked 7900 GRE looked good for perf/price ratio.
But I'd wait for AMD to finally announce details and pricing for new gen, I think it's a bad moment to buy a new GPU until all Nvidia and AMD announcements are done.
I'm not a fan of LLMs, but an app has absolutely no business deciding what input method I use.
This feels too similar to completely idiotic practice of blocking the copy-paste of credentials and disallowing password managers in certain apps/websites.
Yes, and another big difference is that Bottles refuses to provide any kind of help to package maintainers.According to maintainers' comments on the Github project, they have to figure out how to build it by trial and error.
I was actually really surprised that there's isn't any kind of build documentation.It's pretty unusual.
I don't think it's understandable in this case, no.
The entire project depends on Wine, imagine if Wine devs restricted Bottles in what way they are allowed to use it just because Wine project doesn't want to deal with bugs potentially introduced by the Bottles dev.
But they won't, because of the license.And neither can the Bottles devs.
If they want to have total control over their source code, fine, but then they cannot claim to be open-source and release it under GPL.
It's kinda shitty, but after reading the other links in the post I can't say it's very surprising.
Bottles devs seem weirdly hostile to the idea of anyone repackaging their software, because apparently they're the only ones that are able to do it properly.
edit: devs also refuse bug reports from any version that's not Flatpak, so in this context removing the button doesn't seem that unreasonable.
edit2: now that I've had a closer look at the PR mentioned in the post I'm not surprised at all.Bottles devs are actively hostile. Apparently with this PR it's impossible to run Bottles outside Flatpak without the package maintainers patching the code.
I also liked the part where they decided they don't need to pay the VAT.