You're being pedantic. The point was the progressive tax based on income, not which country does it. Funny enough, I found some online examples of Norway using that for the worst traffic offences, and though I remembered that from when I visited. But if you live there I assume you are more correct than the few online sources. The "either way" was meant to say that the example country does not matter when providing an example of a good idea.
The GDPR laid out ways of fining that can impact large companies. It uses a percentage of revenue. Similar to how Norway uses % of a person's income for traffic violations. It is possible to use methods like these to level the playing field. That is, if there's an appetite for fairness.
It's worse than that. While the power company starts making plans for the additional load that's already there, datacenter developers bring in gas turbine generators. This adds to the noise and pollution. The local municipality may fine them a few hundred dollars a month for violations, but that's the cost of doing business.
Award that's gold plated and mentions peace.